Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026
E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
The Association Between Health-Related Quality of Life Scores and Clinical Outcomes for People Living With Lung
Susan V Harden1,2,3, Madeleine T King4, Jing Jing Li5
1School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Introduction:
Improving patient-centered outcomes is a core aim of value-based healthcare (VBHC). Integrating patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs) into clinical quality registries may provide insight into health-related quality of life (HRQL) and variation in care. We piloted PROMs/PREMs collection in an Australian Lung Cancer Registry to evaluate associations between HRQL, clinical outcomes and treatment value.
Methods:
Individuals newly diagnosed with lung cancer across five metropolitan health services were invited to complete electronic PROMs (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC29) and PREMs at baseline and follow-up. Preference-based utilities (QLU-C10D) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were derived and linked with registry clinical data. Stage-specific Australian health system cost estimates for guideline concordant treatment (GCT) provided context for value-based reporting. Multivariable regression examined associations between HRQL and clinical variables.
Results:
Baseline PROMs/PREMs were completed by 241/490 (49%) participants. HRQL was associated with cancer stage, ECOG performance status ≥ 2, comorbidities, weight loss, and receipt of GCT (p = 0.041). HRQL remained stable among ongoing respondents over time. Estimated health system costs increased with advancing stage, while earlier stage disease was associated with better HRQL and survival. A registry-level VBHC dashboard integrating HRQL, patient experience, clinical quality indicators and cost context was developed to support health service performance review.
Conclusions:
PROMs/PREMs linked with clinical and cost data provided meaningful insight into patient-centered outcomes and drivers of value in lung cancer care. This VBHC framework highlights the importance of early diagnosis and access to evidence-based treatment and offers a scalable approach to support patient-centered quality improvement at the health system level.
Related Concept Videos
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
01:26COPD: Management Using Bronchodilators and Corticosteroids
01:27Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
01:25Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
01:21Cancer Survival Analysis