Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.4K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.4K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.8K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.8K
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

604
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
604
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.2K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.2K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.4K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.4K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

8.3K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
8.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aging Out of the Blue: Region-Specific Epigenetic Clock Calibration for a Blue Zone with the DNAm SuperLearner.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same authorSame journal

Discovery of critical thresholds in mixed exposures and estimation of policy intervention effects.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same authorSame journal

Semiparametric discovery and estimation of interaction in mixed exposures using stochastic interventions.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same author

Multiomic analyses of longitudinal plasma samples identify thromboinflammation endotypes and trajectories in patients with trauma.

Science translational medicine·2026
Same author

Associations between floor material and <i>E. coli</i> contamination in rural Bangladeshi households.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Using machine learning to identify subgroups with the highest expected benefit in a population-based water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition intervention.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same journal

Testing for treatment effect twice using internal and external controls in clinical trials.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same journal

An approach to nonparametric inference on the causal dose-response function.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same journal

Assessing surrogate heterogeneity in real world data using meta-learners.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same journal

Estimating average causal effects with incomplete exposure and confounders.

Journal of causal inference·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster
07:02

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster

Published on: March 24, 2023

4.3K

Bridging binarization: causal inference with dichotomized continuous exposures.

Kaitlyn Lee1, Alan Hubbard1, Alejandro Schuler1

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

Journal of Causal Inference
|February 23, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Binarizing continuous exposures is a valid causal inference method. This study demonstrates its statistical validity and introduces a new parameter for more relevant causal questions about continuous exposures.

Keywords:
62D20continuous exposuresmodified treatment policiesobservational causal inference

More Related Videos

Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Vapor Exposure Paired with Two-Bottle Choice to Model Alcohol Use Disorder
05:12

Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Vapor Exposure Paired with Two-Bottle Choice to Model Alcohol Use Disorder

Published on: June 23, 2023

1.7K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster
07:02

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster

Published on: March 24, 2023

4.3K
Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Vapor Exposure Paired with Two-Bottle Choice to Model Alcohol Use Disorder
05:12

Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Vapor Exposure Paired with Two-Bottle Choice to Model Alcohol Use Disorder

Published on: June 23, 2023

1.7K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

Area of Science:

  • Causal Inference
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Average treatment effect (ATE) is typically defined for binary exposures.
  • Continuous exposures are often dichotomized, raising statistical concerns.
  • Existing methods for continuous exposures lack clear interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate binarization as a statistically sound method for continuous exposures.
  • To clarify assumptions and interpretation of binarized causal effect estimators.
  • To introduce a novel parameter for more relevant causal questions.

Main Methods:

  • Equivalence proof between binarized ATE and modified treatment policies.
  • Demonstration of assumed relative self-selection preservation.
  • Introduction of a new benchmarked target parameter.

Main Results:

  • Binarization is statistically equivalent to specific modified treatment policies.
  • Clarified assumptions underlying binarization and interpretation of estimators.
  • Proposed a new parameter addressing more relevant causal questions.

Conclusions:

  • Binarization is a valid approach for causal inference with continuous exposures.
  • Understanding and stating assumptions is crucial for proper interpretation.
  • The new parameter offers a more relevant benchmark for causal analysis.