Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Chewing efficiency and patient-centered outcomes in maxillary rehabilitation with zygomatic vs. conventional
Lijuan Ye1,2, Jie Li1,2, Yuwei Dai1,2,3
1Department of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Purpose:
This study aimed to assess whether zygomatic implant-supported fixed restorations (ZIFRs) provide comparable chewing efficiency and patient-centered outcomes to conventional implant-supported fixed restorations (CIFRs) in edentulous maxilla cases.
Material And Methods:
A total of 29 patients were enrolled in this study. These patients with maxillary edentulism received ZIFR (16) or CIFR (13) treatment between October 2018 and April 2022. Chewing efficiency was evaluated by the subjective assessments of the scales of chewed gums and the variance of the Hue in a two-color chewing gum mixing ability test. In addition, the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) was employed to compare the oral health-related quality of life of patients between these two groups.
Results:
There were no significant differences in chewing efficiency between the ZIFR and CIFR groups according to the results of the subjective assessments (P = 0.59 and P = 0.19 in the first and second stroke of the chewing test, respectively) and the variance of the Hue (P = 0.55 in the first stroke and P = 0.28 in the second stroke). Based on OHIP-14 results, the ZIFR group reported less psychological pain, physical disability, and psychological discomfort. In addition, the success rate of implants in the ZIFR and CIFR groups was 100% and 98.1% at the implant level and 100% and 93.75% at the patient level, respectively.
Conclusions:
With the limitations of the study, the chewing efficiency of ZIFRs was comparable to CIFRs in the rehabilitation of maxillary edentulism. However, under such conditions, ZIFRs can offer better postoperative quality of life compared to CIFRs.
More Related Videos
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
07:32Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
Related Concept Videos
01:19Restorative Care
01:27Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...
01:15Teeth
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin and...