Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
Published on: February 19, 2021
AI-powered Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging (AI-GEPCI) - a Comprehensive Multiparametric Neurological Protocol
Jeramy Lewis1, Manu S Goyal1, Gregory F Wu2
1Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Background:
MRI plays an essential role in diagnosing and monitoring neurological diseases. Conventional protocols rely on multiple sequences to obtain complementary contrasts, increasing scan time, cost, and tolerability. Generating multiple contrasts from a single acquisition may streamline workflow while maintaining clinical utility.
Purpose:
Train attention-based convolutional neural networks (ACNNs) to generate clinical-quality FLAIR, MPRAGE, R2*, and derived contrasts from a single Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging (GEPCI) acquisition, enabling multi-contrast imaging from one scan.
Study Type:
Retrospective.
Population:
43 MRI scans from individuals with multiple sclerosis (25/18 F/M, 49±11 years old).
Field Strength/Sequence:
3T MRI was used to obtain 3D GEPCI, MPRAGE, and FLAIR sequences.
Assessment:
Technical quality of the AI-generated contrasts was evaluated against directly acquired MRI images using structural similarity index (SSIM). Quantitative accuracy for R2* maps was evaluated using normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE). Clinical image quality was assessed by expert physicians. Lesion volumes and counts were obtained using automated segmentation.
Results:
AI-generated FLAIR and MPRAGE images achieved mean SSIM values of 0.923±0.028 and 0.935±0.022, respectively. The generated R2* maps achieved a mean SSIM of 0.996±0.006, with quantitative accuracy reflected by an NRMSE of 0.031±0.020. Physicians rated GEPCI-FLAIR images at 4.2 and GEPCI-MPRAGE images at 4.5 (on a 1-to-5 scale), both exceeding the clinically routine standard of 4.0. Lesion volume and count comparisons from automated segmentation showed strong agreement between AI-generated and ground-truth measurements (R2=0.988 and R2=0.933, respectively).
Conclusion:
AI-GEPCI generated multiple clinically relevant MRI contrasts from a single GEPCI acquisition with high similarity to corresponding acquired images. Radiological reviews and quantitative analyses supported the feasibility of producing high-quality, intrinsically co-registered multi-contrasts for comprehensive brain evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET

