Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Heterotopic Auxiliary Rat Liver Transplantation With Flow-regulated Portal Vein Arterialization in Acute Hepatic Failure
Published on: September 13, 2014
Comparative Efficacy of Standard-Volume Plasma Exchange Versus High-Volume Plasma Exchange in Patients With
Aarushi Sahni1, Rekha Hans1, Sharanya Ramakrishnan1
1Department of Transfusion Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Abstract:
High-volume therapeutic plasma exchange (HV-TPE) is an established treatment modality in acute liver failure; however, its role in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and its comparative efficacy versus standard-volume TPE (SV-TPE) remain unclear. This single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study conducted over 2 years (2021-2023) compared the efficacy of HV-TPE and SV-TPE in patients with ACLF. Twenty-two consecutive patients with ACLF Grade I and II without prospects for liver transplantation were enrolled; 11 patients underwent HV-TPE, and 11 underwent SV-TPE. In addition to tolerability, the effects of both TPE modalities on coagulation parameters, biochemical indices, cytokine levels (IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α), and clinical severity scores-including the Asia Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) score, Maddrey discriminant function (MDF), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score-were assessed before and after therapy. Length of hospital stay and 30-day and 90-day mortality were also compared. Both HV-TPE and SV-TPE resulted in significant improvement in coagulation parameters, including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and international normalized ratio (INR), along with significant reductions in serum total and conjugated bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, total protein, and serum ammonia (p < 0.05). Significant improvement in serum urea (p = 0.004), serum creatinine (p = 0.004), and serum lactate (p = 0.007) was observed only in the HV-TPE group. Clinical severity scores (AARC, MDF, MELD, and CTP) improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in 30-day mortality (27% vs. 27%, p = 1.00), 90-day mortality (36% vs. 45%, p = 0.40), or changes in cytokine levels. Procedure-related adverse events were infrequent and comparable between HV-TPE (6.8%) and SV-TPE (5.7%). In conclusion, both HV-TPE and SV-TPE effectively improved clinical severity scores in patients with ACLF; however, a definitive difference in mortality benefit could not be demonstrated in this study. Trial Registration: CTRI/2019/06/019660 (dated 14 June 2019).
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...

