Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Revisiting educational assumptions: The surprising negative link between creative extracurricular activities and
Kagan Sofiia1, Denis Dumas1, Yoojoong Kim1
1Department of Educational Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Creative thinking performance is negatively linked to student activities. However, factors like openness and self-efficacy can positively influence this relationship, suggesting a need to restructure creative activities.
Area of Science:
- Educational Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- International Comparative Studies
Background:
- The 2022 PISA creative thinking report indicated a surprising negative association between student creative thinking performance and engagement in creative activities.
- This contradicts the general understanding that skill development stems from relevant practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if the negative association between creative activities and creative thinking is linear.
- To determine if this association persists across different countries.
- To examine if psychological and contextual moderators influence this relationship.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the PISA 2022 creative thinking assessment.
- Included a large analytical sample of 372,193 students from 49 countries.
- Employed correlation analysis and multiple regression, controlling for psychosocial and contextual factors.
Main Results:
- A negative correlation was found between creative thinking and both in-school (r = -0.25) and out-of-school (r = -0.32) activities, consistent across most countries.
- These activities remained negative predictors of creative performance after controlling for other variables (β = -0.06 and β = -0.27).
- Openness to intellect and creative self-efficacy moderated the negative association for out-of-school activities, showing positive links. Feeling safe at school also moderated in-school activities.
Conclusions:
- The findings suggest that current creative activities may require restructuring to effectively support student creativity.
- There is a need for continued refinement of creativity assessment measures.
- Psychological and contextual factors play a role in moderating the impact of creative activities on performance.
More Related Videos
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Critical Thinking I
Critical Thinking II
Critical Thinking
Colleges and universities are...
Creative Thinking
Divergent thinking is the...
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Counterfactual Thinking