Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

08:43
Fused Filament Fabrication FFF of Metal-Ceramic Components
Published on: January 11, 2019
18.2K
Feasibility Study of Manufacturing Hydraulic Fittings Using Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Comparative Analysis
Jakub Backiel1, Pawel Dzienis1, Karol Golak1
1Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45C, 15-351 Białystok, Poland.
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 27, 2026
Summary
Additive manufacturing (AM) shows promise for producing hydraulic fittings, but current Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and Stereolithography (SLA) methods fail leak tightness tests. Further material and design research is needed for viable 3D-printed hydraulic components.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Manufacturing Engineering
- Mechanical Engineering
Background:
- Conventional hydraulic fitting production generates significant material waste.
- Additive manufacturing (AM) offers a potential solution to reduce waste and enable customized component fabrication.
- Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and Stereolithography (SLA) are emerging AM technologies for component manufacturing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the feasibility of manufacturing hydraulic fittings using FDM and SLA.
- To assess the dimensional accuracy, thread quality, and leak tightness of 3D-printed hydraulic fittings.
- To compare the performance of FDM- and SLA-printed fittings against conventional brass fittings.
Main Methods:
- Hydraulic fittings were designed using CAD software (SolidWorks 2022).
- FDM with PETG and SLA with photopolymer resin were used for fabrication.
- Non-destructive leak testing was performed per PN-EN 1254 standards (0.1–1.0 bar).
- Dimensional accuracy and microscopic thread quality were analyzed.
Main Results:
- SLA parts showed ~1% shrinkage; FDM parts showed ~2% shrinkage.
- SLA exhibited superior thread quality over FDM, which had layer separation and porosity.
- Both FDM and SLA fittings failed leak tightness tests above 0.5 bar and experienced structural failure at 1.0 bar.
- Brass reference fittings maintained seal integrity.
Conclusions:
- Current FDM and SLA processes with PETG and photopolymer resin, respectively, do not yield leak-tight hydraulic fittings.
- Achieved dimensional tolerances are acceptable, but material properties and thread geometry limit performance.
- Further research into advanced materials (e.g., reinforced polymers) and design optimization is recommended for AM hydraulic fittings.

