Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Measurement of the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient and Transjugular Liver Biopsy
Published on: June 18, 2020
Hepatosplenic Volumes and Portal Pressure Gradient Identify One-year Further Decompensation Risk Post-transjugular
Xinyu Chen1, Yicheng Lin1, Kefeng Jia2
1The Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin University Central Hospital (Tianjin Third Central Hospital), Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin, China.
Background And Aims:
Further decompensation in cirrhosis is associated with increased mortality. However, reliable tools to predict further decompensation after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are currently limited. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors of further decompensation within one year post-TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and to develop a predictive model for identifying high-risk individuals.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study enrolled 152 patients with cirrhosis undergoing TIPS for variceal bleeding and/or refractory ascites (January 2018-January 2024). Patients were stratified according to one-year decompensation outcomes. LASSO regression and multivariable logistic analysis were used to identify predictors, and a nomogram was constructed and internally validated using bootstrapping (1,000 replicates).
Results:
Among the 152 patients (median age 57.5 years [IQR 50.0-66.0]; 58.6% male; 58.6% viral/alcohol-associated etiology), 65.8% (100/152) achieved clinical stability at one year post-TIPS, while 34.2% (52/152) developed further decompensation. LASSO regression identified right hepatic lobe volume, spleen volume, and portal pressure gradient (PPG) reduction as key predictors, all independently associated with further decompensation risk in multivariable analysis (OR [95% CI]: 0.683 [0.535-0.873], 1.435 [1.240-1.661], and 0.961 [0.927-0.996], respectively). The nomogram demonstrated superior discrimination compared with PPG reduction alone and benchmark prognostic scores (AUC 0.854 [0.792-0.915] vs. 0.619-0.652; ΔAUC +0.201-+0.235, p < 0.001) with 92.3% sensitivity. High-risk patients (score > 86) had a 10.7-fold higher risk of further decompensation than low-risk patients (60.0% vs. 5.6%; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions:
This validated model, combining hepatosplenic volumetry and PPG reduction, accurately stratifies further decompensation risk post-TIPS and may guide targeted surveillance and preventive interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Hepatic Portal System
At its core, the hepatic portal vein is the result of a confluence of the superior and inferior mesenteric veins along with the splenic vein. Each of these veins has a unique role. The superior mesenteric vein is...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...

