Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
#infertility education on Instagram: A Reliability Analysis in Brazil Using the DISCERN Instrument
Márcia Mendonça Carneiro1,2, Renata Bossi2, Debora Alvarenga2
1Federal University of Minas Gerais School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Belo Horizonte MG Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the School of Medicine of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Objective:
To assess the prevalence, authorship, and reliability of educational fertility-related information shared on Brazilian Instagram, measured by the DISCERN instrument.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study analyzed public fertility-related educational Instagram posts published in March 2021 related to the following hashtags: #infertility, #ivf, #endometriosis, #tryingtoconceive, #maternity, #humanreproduction, #pregnancy, #invitrofertilization, #assistedreproduction, #pregnant, #difficulttogetpregnant. Educational posts were evaluated using the DISCERN tool. Authorship was categorized as either healthcare professional (HCP) or layperson (LP).
Results:
The majority of the 37 analyzed posts were authored by HCP (n = 33; 89.2%), with 24 of these being physicians, five fertility clinics, four allied HCP, one magazine, and three LP. Most posts (n = 15) focused on fertility treatments; other topics included information about diseases, exams, and diagnosis. The mean Discern analysis scores for each question were: (1) Are the aims clear? 4.86; (2) Does it achieve its aims? 4.75; (3) Is it relevant? 4.47; (4) Is it clear what sources of information were used to compile the publication (other than the author or producer)? 1.58; (5) Is it clear when the information used or reported in the publication was produced? 1.59; (6) Is it balanced and unbiased? 1.59; (7) Does it provide details of additional sources of support and information? 1.04; (8) Does it refer to areas of uncertainty? 1.39.
Conclusions:
Although physicians authored most posts that clearly stated the aim and relevance, important issues such as the source of information used and details about additional sources of support and information were not available. The posts analyzed here failed to be balanced and unbiased and did not inform about potential areas of uncertainty.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Infertility in Females
Endometriosis, a condition characterized by abnormal growth of...
Infertility in Males
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Regression Toward the Mean
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...

