Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

A Practical Guide for the Production and PET/CT Imaging of 68Ga-DOTATATE for Neuroendocrine Tumors in Daily Clinical Practice
Published on: April 17, 2019
Insights into general practice research in The Netherlands and Germany: methodological challenges and suggestions
Aida Bedri1, Henk van der Worp2, Imke Aits3
1Department of Health Services Research, Division of General Practice, School VI - Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany aida.bedri@uni-oldenburg.de.
Background:
We conducted research on the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections in general practices in the Northern Dutch-German cross-border region. The challenges that were encountered in that study are discussed in this article, including prolonged formal ethical and legal processes, data collection, and recruitment of both general practitioners (GPs) and patients.
Aim:
To provide recommendations for those in the early stages of planning and conducting research in general practices.
Design & Setting:
Opinion paper based on the authors' experience conducting a cross-border prospective study.
Method:
An overview of the strategies used to collect data and recruit participants is presented, along with their respective advantages and disadvantages.
Results:
GPs were recruited by post, email, and newsletters, with varying success rates depending on the region. Overall, personal approaches fared better, leading to increased willingness to participate in the study. Two different measures were used to collect data: students in The Netherlands and practice assistants in Germany. While using student assistants alleviated the constraints associated with study participation for a general practice, their limited availability disrupted the continuity of data collection phases. Instructing practice assistants to collect data independently enhanced flexibility regarding patient recruitment, but the authors' experience revealed that this approach was more prone to errors, likely as a result of heavy workloads. Designating a contact person within the practice facilitated communication between the practice and the researchers, providing reminders for ongoing study recruitment.
Conclusion:
With research in general practice becoming increasingly important, it is necessary to illustrate and understand its barriers and facilitators. Data collection strategies have to be carefully assessed and selected according to the specific needs of practices (such as flexibility and time constraints) to mitigate disruption of regular care.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...

