Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

95.8K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
95.8K
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

432
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
432
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

15.6K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.6K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.5K
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

271
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
271
Bias01:22

Bias

7.7K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nursing home family involvement and activities of daily living during COVID-19: A secondary cross-sectional analysis of electronic health record data.

Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Structural ableism and institutionalization of disabled people.

Rehabilitation psychology·2026
Same author

The direct support professional (DSP) workforce as a social determinant of health of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Disability and health journal·2026
Same author

The prototypical disabled person and its implications for discrimination research and intersectionality.

Rehabilitation psychology·2025
Same author

Reasons for cannabis use among adults with disabilities: Findings from the 2023-2024 National Survey on Health and Disabilities.

Disability and health journal·2025
Same author

"Do you want to know or not?" How prenatal providers manage clinical uncertainty related to chromosomal risk and noninvasive prenatal testing.

Health (London, England : 1997)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.9K

Hidden Bias: Social Service Professionals' Attitudes toward Physical Disability.

Aleksa Owen1, Carli Friedman2

  • 1Aleksa Owen, PhD, LMSW, is assistant professor, School of Social Work, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 North Virginia Street, Building AB, Room 523A, Reno, NV 89557, USA.

Social Work
|February 28, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Social service professionals often exhibit implicit bias against people with physical disabilities, despite reporting no explicit preference. This study highlights the need for interventions to address these unconscious attitudes in social work practice.

Keywords:
disabilityimplicit biasprejudicesocial work education

More Related Videos

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.9K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.9K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.9K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Disability Studies
  • Social Work Research

Background:

  • Implicit social cognition, or implicit bias, can influence social work practice.
  • Understanding social service professionals' attitudes toward physical disability is crucial due to their work with this population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively analyze explicit and implicit attitudes of social service professionals toward physical disability.
  • To identify factors correlating with these attitudes.
  • To discuss interventions for reducing disability-related implicit bias.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative analysis of secondary 2023 data from 5,167 social service professionals (social workers, counselors).
  • Descriptive and inferential statistical tests were employed.
  • Assessment of both explicit and implicit attitudes towards physical disability.

Main Results:

  • 70.3% reported no explicit preference, 23.7% preferred those without disabilities, 6.0% preferred those with disabilities.
  • 77.8% showed implicit preference for people without disabilities, 13.7% had no implicit preference, 8.5% implicitly preferred those with disabilities.
  • Significant discordance between explicit and implicit attitudes was observed, often with low explicit bias and high implicit bias. Age, gender, disability status, personal connections to disability, education, and political orientation correlated with attitudes.

Conclusions:

  • A significant portion of social service professionals hold implicit biases against individuals with physical disabilities, contrasting with their stated explicit attitudes.
  • Demographic and personal factors are associated with both explicit and implicit disability attitudes.
  • Educational interventions are proposed to mitigate disability-related implicit bias in social work.