Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Con: All Cardiac Arrest Patients Should Be Transferred to a Cardiac Arrest Center
Samuel I Garcia1, Patrick M Wieruszewski2
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Abstract:
Cardiac arrest centers (CACs) provide important critical expertise and advanced resources for select out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, and their role within regional systems of care is both intuitive and necessary. However, a universal transport strategy for all cardiac arrest patients to CACs is neither evidence-based nor system-efficient. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a heterogeneous syndrome, and outcomes are driven predominantly by prehospital factors, patient characteristics, and arrest etiology. Existing data suggest that benefits associated with treatment at CACs are concentrated within specific subgroups, while indiscriminate transfer may delay stabilization, increase transport-related risk, preclude candidacy for advanced therapies, exacerbate rural-urban disparities, and strain finite critical care resources. A selective, triage-based approach to regionalization, prioritizing patients most likely to benefit from specialized care at CACs, may better optimize outcomes while preserving system resilience and equitable access to care.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

