Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Factors supporting research capacity development in an English local authority: a qualitative description and
Shannon M Kennedy1,2, Annette Haywood3, Susan Hampshaw4,5
1Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. shannon.kennedy5@nhs.net.
Background:
Research capacity development (RCD) involves resourced and sustained multi-faceted skill-building to enable high-quality, useful research alongside social change. Local authorities (LAs) have substantial potential to enhance health and wellbeing through research engagement given their role shaping determinants of health, access to rich data and interest in "what works". This paper presents a qualitative reanalysis of research interviews undertaken in an NIHR funded Local Authority Research Systems (LARS) project in Doncaster Council, an upper-tier LA in England. It considers RCD mechanisms developed in health and care and public service literature to extend theoretical insights into RCD in English local government.
Methods:
Initial project sampling was purposive, using a snowball approach. Interviewee work areas spanned adult and young people's services. The interview schedule drew on mechanisms identified in published literature. Secondary thematic framework analysis of the transcripts of the 15 study interviews also used a deductive frame of mechanisms from published literature. Secondary analysis included discussion and review among the authors to refine themes and analysis.
Results:
Interviewees identified mechanistic and cultural determinants of research capacity in this LA. Key themes were collaboration; making a difference; indications of expectations and importance of research; relationship between research, practice and policy; resource and capacity; and research as everyone's business. Our findings support the relevance of previously published RCD mechanisms to the LA context. Some mechanisms resonated more than others: "exceeding the sum of parts", "coproduction" and "feeling you are making a difference". The latter of these mechanisms resonated strongly.
Conclusions:
RCD mechanisms can stimulate joint work, promote synergy and unlock potential. Research partnerships should focus on local impact for communities and balance between scientific rigour and actionable research. Success relies on dialogue and co-production across research, health and care, and departments within LAs to address the wider determinants of health. This includes setting joint priorities, brave leadership and power-sharing between stakeholders. LAs can take steps including making research core business, ensuring protected time and experiential learning, and community involvement in research. Lessons from this study may offer transferable insights that inform RCD in comparable local government settings.
More Related Videos
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Factors Affecting Workability
Factorial Design
Naturalistic Observations