Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Impact of Cangrelor on Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome in High Bleeding
Abhishek Chaturvedi1, Patrick J Creechan2, Andrew P Hill1
1Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Insights
Cangrelor use in high-bleeding-risk acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention did not improve outcomes. Event rates were similar despite higher acuity in the cangrelor group, suggesting potential benefit in select patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The safety and efficacy of cangrelor in high-bleeding-risk (HBR) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) require further investigation.
- Existing data on cangrelor use in this specific patient population are limited, necessitating a focused evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of cangrelor on ischemic and bleeding outcomes in HBR ACS patients following PCI.
- To compare in-hospital composite ischemic events and major bleeding between cangrelor and non-cangrelor groups in this cohort.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 2509 ACS patients undergoing PCI between 2018-2023 was conducted, with 1007 identified as HBR.
- Patients requiring specific interventions (cardiogenic shock, thrombectomy, glycoprotein 2b/3a inhibitors) were excluded.
- Multivariate analysis adjusted for key clinical factors to compare ischemic and major bleeding events between cangrelor and non-cangrelor groups.
Main Results:
- The study included 1007 HBR ACS patients (mean age 71.8 years, 54.5% male).
- The cangrelor group presented with higher acuity, including increased rates of ST-elevation ACS, new-onset heart failure, intra-aortic balloon pump use, and acute kidney injury.
- Multivariate analysis revealed similar rates of ischemic events (OR: 1.52, p=0.30) and major bleeding (OR: 1.65, p=0.09) between the cangrelor and non-cangrelor groups.
Conclusions:
- Cangrelor use in HBR ACS patients undergoing PCI was not associated with improved ischemic or bleeding outcomes compared to oral P2Y12 inhibitors.
- Despite higher patient acuity, similar event rates in the cangrelor group suggest a potential benefit in select HBR ACS patients without increasing bleeding risk.
Abstract:
The safety and efficacy of cangrelor during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in high-bleeding-risk (HBR) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients remain unclear. We evaluated the impact of cangrelor on outcomes after PCI in HBR ACS patients. ACS patients with data available to identify HBR status (per 2019 Academic Research Consortium criteria) who underwent PCI at our institution between 2018 and 2023 (n = 2509) were screened. Those presenting with cardiogenic shock or requiring thrombectomy or glycoprotein 2b/3a inhibitors during PCI were excluded (n = 201) and 1007 were categorized as HBR. In-hospital composite ischemic events (inpatient mortality, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke) and major bleeding (intracranial hemorrhage, blood transfusion for hemoglobin drop >3g/dl) were compared between cangrelor and noncangrelor groups. The cohort had a mean age of 71.8 years and 54.5% were male. Cangrelor group had fewer chronic comorbidities but presented with higher acuity, with increased rates of ST-elevation (STE-ACS) (33.4% vs 6%, p <0.001), greater new-onset congestive heart failure (CHF) (10.3% vs 3.5%, p <0.001), intra-aortic balloon pump use (11.9% vs 4.4%, p <0.001), and new acute kidney injury (AKI) (10.9% vs 5.7%, p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, STE-ACS, new onset CHF, and AKI showed similar ischemic (OR [CI]: 1.52 [0.68 to 3.27], p = 0.30) and major bleeding (OR [CI]: 1.65 [0.92 to 2.93], p = 0.09) outcomes among cangrelor and noncangrelor patients. In conclusion, cangrelor use in HBR ACS patients undergoing PCI was not associated with improved outcomes versus oral P2Y12 inhibitors, although similar event rates despite higher acuity in the cangrelor group may suggest potential benefit in select patients without added bleeding risk.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Angina IV: Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins