Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026
Characterization of the Isolated, Ventilated, and Instrumented Mouse Lung Perfused with Pulsatile Flow
Published on: April 29, 2011
Continuous vs pulsatile arterial cannula flow for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A multiscale
Avishka Wickramarachchi1, Michael Neidlin2, Mehrdad Khamooshi1
1Advanced Cardiorespiratory Engineering Laboratory, Centre for Biomedical Technologies and School of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Background And Objective:
Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) circuits typically utilise a continuous flow (CF) of blood to support patients suffering from refractory cardiorespiratory dysfunction. Pulsatile flow (PF) VA ECMO is an emerging technology being developed to overcome adverse effects associated with non-physiological CF VA ECMO such as worsening of microcirculatory and cardiac function. However, the flow dynamics associated with PF VA ECMO, such as positioning of the watershed region, wall shear stress, and ventricular unloading are still largely unknown. Therefore, to address this gap, our study aimed to utilise computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to compare the arterial cannula flow characteristics generated by CF and PF VA ECMO.
Methods:
A multiscale CFD model was created using a patient-specific aortic geometry and employed a closed-loop lumped parameter network as boundary conditions. Mean VA ECMO flow rates of 3, 4, and 5 L/min were simulated for both CF and counter-pulsed PF scenarios.
Results:
The hemodynamic results demonstrated increased stroke volume, ejection fraction, and coronary flow during PF VA ECMO, and decreased left ventricular volumes, afterload, and pressure-volume areas, when compared to CF VA ECMO. Delivery of oxygen saturated blood from VA ECMO to the upper body decreased slightly during PF VA ECMO during 4 L/min of support. Lastly, wall shear stress on the aortic wall increased substantially during PF VA ECMO, when compared to CF VA ECMO.
Conclusions:
The findings from this study suggest varied hemodynamic and flow dynamic outcomes when comparing CF and PF VA ECMO, each with their own benefits and drawbacks.
Related Concept Videos
01:04Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system...
01:17Autoregulation of Blood Flow
Chemical Signaling in Autoregulation
Chemical signaling operates at the precapillary sphincter level, inciting either contraction or relaxation....
01:26Oxygen Delivering System I: Nasal Cannula and Face Mask
Nasal Cannula
A nasal cannula is a lightweight tube split at one end into two prongs and placed in the nostrils. It is typically used to deliver low to medium levels of oxygen.
Suggested flow rate: The suggested flow rate for a nasal cannula typically ranges between 1 and 6 L/min.
Oxygen percentage setting:...
01:16Oxygen Delivering System II: Venturi Mask and Transtracheal Oxygen
Venturi Mask
The Venturi mask, named after the Venturi effect, is designed to deliver precise oxygen concentrations. It consists of a large tube with an oxygen inlet that narrows down, causing a pressure drop that pulls air in through adjustable side ports. The mask is a lightweight,...
01:23Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
01:23Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...