Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 4, 2026

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
Published on: May 31, 2021
Evaluating the Validity of the EQ-HWB-9 in a Large United Kingdom General Population Sample
Emily McDool1, Clara Mukuria2, Nyantara Wickramasekera1
1Sheffield Centre of Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Objectives:
The EQ Health and Well-being (EQ-HWB-9) is a preference-weighted instrument with an interim value set for assessing health and well-being in patients, social care users, and carers. This study evaluated the experimental (2022) version's psychometric properties and compared it with established measures in a UK general population sample.
Methods:
Data were drawn from a large cross-sectional survey of the UK general population (n = 11 383). Ceiling/floor effects were assessed at item (>50% extreme responses) and instrument (>15% at min/max score) levels. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman correlations between EQ-HWB-9 items and conceptually similar items from the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults, Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), Office for National Statistics 4 Personal Well-being Questions, and Systems-science In Public Health and Health Economics Research. Pearson correlations were used for utility scores. Known-group validity was assessed using effect sizes (ES) to examine differences by mental well-being, disability, life satisfaction, caregiving status, self-reported health, and age. Agreement with comparator instruments was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient.
Results:
Potential ceiling effects were noted for EQ-HWB-9 mobility and activity items, but not at the instrument level. Strong correlations (rs≥0.5, p<.001) with measures hypothesized a priori to assess related constructs (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults, HUI3, Office for National Statistics 4 Personal Well-being Questions, and Systems-science In Public Health and Health Economics Research) supported convergent validity. The EQ-HWB-9 effectively distinguished between relevant population subgroups (ES ≥0.8). Agreement with HUI3 utilities was higher (concordance correlation coefficients >0.75) than with other comparators.
Conclusions:
The EQ-HWB-9 shows strong psychometric performance and is supported for use in UK health and well-being assessments.
Related Concept Videos
Sample Proportion and Population Proportion
Reliability and Validity
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

