Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Nasolabial morphological changes following anterior vs. subapical maxillary segmental osteotomy: a comparative study
Yaoran Liu1, Guangwei Chen1, Zhengguo Piao1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Anterior maxillary segmental osteotomy (AMSO) and subapical anterior maxillary segmental osteotomy (SAMSO) effectively correct maxillary protrusion. AMSO offers more significant changes in lip and nasal width, while SAMSO primarily impacts nasal height and tip angle.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics and Maxillofacial Surgery
- 3D Cephalometric Analysis
- Skeletal and Soft Tissue Morphology
Background:
- Maxillary protrusion presents challenges in achieving optimal facial aesthetics and function.
- Surgical correction often involves anterior maxillary osteotomies to reposition the maxilla.
- Comparing different osteotomy techniques is crucial for refining treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of anterior maxillary segmental osteotomy (AMSO) and subapical anterior maxillary segmental osteotomy (SAMSO) on nasolabial morphology.
- To evaluate hard and soft tissue changes following these surgical procedures using 3D cephalometry.
- To analyze correlations between skeletal movements and soft tissue alterations.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 45 patients with maxillary protrusion treated with AMSO or SAMSO.
- Pre- and post-operative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained ≥1 year after surgery.
- Measurement of 11 distances and 4 angles on lateral views, and 4 distances and 1 angle on frontal views to assess hard and soft tissue changes.
Main Results:
- Both AMSO and SAMSO effectively achieved posterior displacement of the anterior maxilla and reduced maxillary prognathism.
- AMSO resulted in greater vertical impaction of the anterior maxilla and more significant upper lip protrusion retraction compared to SAMSO.
- AMSO led to increased alar base width, while SAMSO showed significant increases in nasal height and nasal tip angle.
Conclusions:
- Both AMSO and SAMSO are effective in correcting maxillary protrusion, improving lip protrusion, and enhancing facial profiles.
- AMSO demonstrates a more pronounced impact on both sagittal and frontal nasolabial soft tissue dimensions.
- SAMSO primarily influences sagittal soft tissue changes with less effect on frontal nasal morphology.
Related Concept Videos
Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...
Cranial Bones: Lateral View
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
Nose and Nasal Cavity

