Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Management and prevention of in-hospital cardiac arrest: present and future
Jonathan Vo1, Faye L Norby2, Paul Marano1
1Center for Cardiac Arrest Prevention, Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute. Cedars-Sinai Health System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Insights
In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) research is significantly less explored than out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This review highlights IHCA knowledge gaps and future research opportunities for improved patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Cardiac arrest, defined as cessation of cardiac mechanical activity, is categorized into in-hospital (IHCA) and out-of-hospital (OHCA) events.
- IHCA and OHCA differ in epidemiology, natural history, comorbidities, care processes, and provider characteristics, necessitating distinct research approaches.
- Existing research, including over 150 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 1995-2019, predominantly focuses on OHCA (>80%), with IHCA receiving less than 10% of investigative attention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge regarding IHCA epidemiology, management, and prevention strategies.
- To identify critical research gaps and opportunities for future investigations specifically within IHCA.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on cardiac arrest research between 1995 and 2019.
- Analysis of the distribution of research focus between IHCA and OHCA.
- Synthesis of current knowledge on IHCA epidemiology, management, and prevention.
Main Results:
- The vast majority of cardiac arrest RCTs (>80%) between 1995 and 2019 concentrated on OHCA.
- A significantly smaller proportion of studies (<10%) focused exclusively on IHCA.
- IHCA has received disproportionately less investigative attention compared to OHCA.
Conclusions:
- There is a substantial disparity in research focus between IHCA and OHCA, with IHCA being under-investigated.
- Further research into IHCA epidemiology, management, and prevention is crucial to improve patient outcomes.
- Identifying and addressing research gaps in IHCA is essential for advancing the field of cardiac arrest care.
Abstract:
Cardiac arrest is most commonly defined as the cessation of cardiac mechanical activity requiring either delivery of chest compressions and/or defibrillation. The condition is often subdivided into in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) based on different locations, but also differences in epidemiology, natural history, co-morbidities, process of care, and provider characteristics. Both are complex conditions that warrant ongoing research to improve management, but IHCA appears to have received disproportionately less investigative attention. Recent reviews of over 150 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted between 1995 and 2019 reported that the vast majority (>80%) were focused on OHCA, approximately 10% on both and <10% were focused solely on IHCA. In this review, we will provide an overview of current knowledge regarding IHCA epidemiology, management and prevention, while also identifying opportunities for future research.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management

