Improving Preclinical Cancer Drug Development Models to Avoid Clinical Failure.
David A Gewirtz1, Beverly Teicher2, Edward Greenberg3
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia.
Summary
Most anti-cancer drugs fail in clinical trials because preclinical models like cell cultures and animal studies do not accurately predict human responses. Improving these models is crucial for effective cancer drug development.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Translational Medicine
Background:
- Preclinical anti-cancer drug development frequently relies on cell cultures and animal models.
- These models often fail to predict clinical efficacy, leading to high attrition rates in drug development.
- Key differences in pharmacokinetics and the absence of immune system involvement in models contribute to this translational gap.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight limitations of current preclinical models in anti-cancer drug development.
- To identify factors that hinder the translation of preclinical findings to clinical success.
- To propose modifications for improving preclinical model utility and enhancing clinical translation.
Main Methods:
- Review and analysis of common preclinical models used in anti-cancer drug development.
- Examination of pharmacokinetic (ADME) and immunological differences between preclinical models and human patients.
- Discussion of existing literature and expert opinion on model limitations.
Main Results:
- Preclinical models often overestimate drug efficacy due to simplified biological systems and lack of human-specific factors.
- Pharmacokinetic (drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) differences between species are significant.
- The use of immune-deficient models excludes the critical role of the immune system in anti-cancer drug response.
Conclusions:
- Current preclinical models have significant limitations that impede the successful translation of anti-cancer drugs to the clinic.
- Modifications to preclinical models, incorporating human-relevant pharmacokinetics and immune system function, are necessary.
- Exploring alternative human cell-based and computer-based assays may improve the predictive power for clinical outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
6.6K
Mice have long served as models for studying human biology and pathology because of their phylogenetic and physiological similarity with humans. They are also easy to maintain and breed in the laboratory, and hence, many inbred strains are now available for research. Studies on mice have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of cancer biology.
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
6.6K
Preclinical Development: Overview
6.2K
Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
6.2K
Treatment Resistant Cancers
3.8K
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.8K


