Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils
Published on: November 25, 2016
Mesoscale Convective Systems in Northeastern North America: identification and evaluation with the
Milena Alpizar1,2, Alejandro Di Luca1,2, Philippe Gachon2,3
1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Montreal, QC Canada.
Abstract:
Extreme precipitation events are often associated with mesoscale meteorological phenomena, such as mesoscale convective systems (MCS). Convection-permitting models (CPMs), which operate at high spatial resolution, have enhanced our ability to represent atmospheric processes associated with mesoscale phenomena. This study aims to identify and evaluate MCSs and associated precipitation events in northeastern North America over the 2015-2022 period using various observational and model-based products. A tracking algorithm is used to identify and characterize MCSs in the ERA5 reanalysis, satellite-based (IMERG) data, radar observations (STAGE-IV and MRMS), and two simulations performed with the sixth version of the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM6). These simulations are performed at horizontal grid spacings of 12 km and 2.5 km (CRCM6-12 and CRCM6-2.5, respectively), with the higher-resolution (2.5 km) simulation operating in CPM mode. Radar observations indicate that MCSs occur most frequently from May to September and typically initiate in the early afternoon. The lower horizontal resolution products (IMERG, CRCM6-12, and ERA5) underestimate both the mean occurrence and interannual variability of MCSs compared to the reference dataset STAGE IV-MERGIR, with mean biases of - 17%, - 50%, and - 88% and standard deviations of 23, 17, and 5.8 MCSs per year, respectively (reference standard deviation = 32 systems per year). The CRCM6-2.5 CPM model configuration accurately reproduces key MCS characteristics, including their intra-annual occurrence, size, duration, intensity, diurnal cycle, and their contribution to total and extreme precipitation. Notably, MCSs contribute more to extreme precipitation events than to the total precipitation. The CRCM6-2.5 model significantly improves the representation of convective processes at finer scales compared to lower-resolution products, although it slightly overestimates precipitation in comparison to radar observations.
Supplementary Information:
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00382-026-08102-6.
Related Concept Videos
Precipitation Processes
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Magnetostatic Boundary Conditions
Boundary Layer Characteristics
Conduction, Convection and Radiation: Problem Solving
In order to solve a problem related to heat transfer, first of all, the situation needs to be examined to determine the type of heat transfer involved. This could...
Precipitation Gravimetry
In determining nickel by gravimetric analysis, a precipitant of ethanolic dimethylglyoxime is added to a hot nickel salt solution. This is quickly followed by the dropwise addition of dilute ammonia solution until precipitation occurs. A...

