Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a Tool for Studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Treatment in Non-human Primates
Published on: September 5, 2017
Diagnostic Yield of [18F]FDG PET/CT in FUO: An Italian Multicenter Study of 929 Patients
Domenico Albano1,2, Francesco Lanfranchi3, Matteo Bauckneht3
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; domenico.albano@unibs.it.
Abstract:
Fever of unknown origin (FUO) presents a significant diagnostic challenge because of its wide range of potential causes. The role of [18F]FDG PET/CT in this complex clinical scenario is not yet fully understood. This multicenter retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value and clinical impact of [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with FUO and to identify specific factors linked to a positive [18F]FDG PET/CT scan. Methods: We retrospectively included 929 patients from 12 centers who underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT for FUO. The final diagnosis for each patient was established on the basis of laboratory, imaging, histopathologic or pathologic examinations, and at least 6 mo of clinical follow-up data. Final diagnoses were classified into 4 categories: infectious diseases, noninfectious inflammatory diseases, malignancies, and unknown causes (no diagnosis). Moreover, the impact of [18F]FDG PET/CT on clinical management, as well as its association with clinical, epidemiologic, and biochemical parameters were analyzed. Results: The final diagnoses included infectious diseases in 332 patients (36%), noninfectious inflammatory diseases in 281 (30%), and malignancies in 103 (11%). The cause of FUO remained undiagnosed in 213 patients (23%). [18F]FDG PET/CT scans had positive results for 549 (59%) patients and negative for the remaining 380 patients. The overall [18F]FDG PET/CT sensitivity was 72% (95% CI, 69%-75%), specificity was 85% (95% CI, 79%-89%), positive predictive value was 94% (95% CI, 92%-96%), negative predictive value was 47% (95% CI, 44%-51%), and accuracy was 75% (95% CI, 72%-78%). Predictive markers for a positive PET/CT scan were high C-reactive protein, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, the presence of fever at the time of PET, and short duration of prior antibiotic therapy. Moreover, [18F]FDG PET/CT findings directly influenced the clinical management of approximately 75% of patients. Conclusion: [18F]FDG PET/CT is a high-yield diagnostic tool that directly influenced clinical management of approximately 75% of patients with FUO, with optimal performance in patients with elevated inflammatory markers, fever at the time of imaging, and limited prior antibiotic use.
More Related Videos
10:02Quantification of Atherosclerotic Plaque Activity and Vascular Inflammation using [18-F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography FDG-PET/CT
Published on: May 2, 2012
10:28Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET