Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

07:42
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
917
Accuracy of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Advanced Lithium Disilicate Crowns Using Different Margin Designs (In
Hossam A Mohamed1, Amir Azer1, Rewaa G AboElHassan1
1Department of Conservative Dentistry, Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt, alexu.edu.eg.
International Journal of Dentistry
|March 6, 2026
Summary
The vertiprep margin design offers the best internal fit for advanced lithium disilicate crowns, though marginal adaptation was comparable to the chamfer design. This study evaluated CAD/CAM crown fit with different margin preparations.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Prosthodontics
- CAD/CAM Dentistry
Background:
- Advanced lithium disilicate glass ceramics provide excellent esthetics for dental restorations.
- Conservative vertical preparations (vertipreps) lack extensive scientific evidence regarding esthetic outcomes compared to traditional shoulder or chamfer designs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the marginal adaptation and internal fit of advanced lithium disilicate (CEREC Tessera) crowns fabricated using CAD/CAM technology.
- To compare the fit of crowns fabricated with three distinct margin designs: chamfer, rounded shoulder, and vertiprep.
Main Methods:
- Three mandibular molar typodont teeth were prepared with chamfer (0.5 mm), rounded shoulder (1 mm), and vertiprep (0.2 mm) margin designs.
- CAD/CAM milling was used to fabricate advanced lithium disilicate crowns (n=8 per group).
- Marginal adaptation was assessed using stereomicroscopy, and internal fit was evaluated after sectioning the crowns.
Main Results:
- Significant differences were found in both marginal adaptation (p < 0.001) and internal fit (p < 0.001) among the margin designs.
- The vertiprep group exhibited the smallest internal gap (70.09 µm), indicating superior internal fit.
- Marginal adaptation was greatest in the rounded shoulder group (125.45 µm), followed by chamfer (107.31 µm) and vertiprep (101.79 µm).
Conclusions:
- The vertiprep margin design demonstrated the best internal fit for advanced lithium disilicate CAD/CAM crowns.
- While vertiprep showed the least marginal gap, its adaptation was not significantly different from the chamfer design.
- These findings suggest vertiprep is a viable conservative margin design for achieving optimal internal fit in lithium disilicate restorations.

