Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Assessing Pediatric Sedation Using Patient-Centered Outcomes
Insights
Pediatric dental sedation success was approximately 69.3%, with older age, male sex, and cooperative behavior predicting better outcomes. Combination sedation regimens did not improve success rates.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Dentistry
- Sedation Anesthesia
- Patient-Centered Outcomes
Background:
- Dental anxiety is common in young children, often necessitating sedation for treatment.
- Evaluating sedation success through patient-centered outcomes is crucial for optimizing pediatric dental care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the success of pediatric dental sedation using patient-centered outcomes.
- To analyze success rates for behavior, safety, and treatment independently and overall.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study analyzed clinical data from 824 children aged 24-60 months undergoing first-time dental sedation.
- Outcomes included behavior (Frankl score), safety (vital signs), and treatment success.
- Logistic regression identified predictors of overall sedation success.
Main Results:
- Overall sedation success was 69.3% (behavior 49.0%, safety 79.5%, treatment 62.1%).
- Oral midazolam showed higher behavioral and safety success than intranasal.
- Older age, male sex, and cooperative presedation behavior significantly increased overall success odds.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric dental sedation success rates vary, with behavior being the least successful outcome.
- Sedation regimen complexity (number of medications) did not impact success.
- Patient factors like age, sex, and presedation cooperation are key predictors of successful dental sedation.
Objective:
To evaluate pediatric dental sedation success using patient-centered outcomes overall and for behavior, safety, and treatment.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study used existing clinical data of children 24 to 60 months of age undergoing first-time sedations (2015-2020) at a children's hospital. Outcomes included behavior success (Frankl score 3-4), safety success (vital signs maintained within 2 SDs of age- and sex-based norms), and treatment success. Overall success was defined as success in at least 2 subcategories. Descriptive statistics, bivariate comparisons, and multiple variable logistic regression were performed.
Results:
In 824 subjects (52.3% female, median age 36 months), overall sedation success was 69.3% (behavior, 49.0%; safety, 79.5%; and treatment, 62.1%). Number of medications (1 vs ≥2) did not affect any outcome measures of success. However, oral vs intranasal midazolam alone had higher behavioral (59.4% vs 44.6%; P < .001) and safety (85.6% vs 76.1%; P = .006) success rates. Age (OR, 95% CI; 1.75, 1.43-2.14; P < .001), male sex (5.53, 1.15-2.18; P = .01), and cooperative presedation behavior (1.79, 1.27-2.53; P = .001) significantly increased the odds of overall success.
Conclusion:
Overall sedation success was approximately 69.3%. Combination regimens were not associated with increased measures of success. Older age, male sex, and cooperative presedation behavior all predicted overall success.
Related Concept Videos
Sedatives and Hypnotics: Overview
Sedative-hypnotics are categorized into barbiturates, benzodiazepines (BZDs), and non-benzodiazepines or Z-drugs. These drugs work by suppressing central nervous system activity, and this suppression is dose-dependent. Older sedative medications, like barbiturates, follow a linear curve in...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Stages of General Anesthesia
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Nursing Evaluation
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
