Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

08:34
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
21.2K
Impact of Optimization Resolution and Dose Calculation Grid Size in Small-Field Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using
Moorthi Thirunavukkarasu1,2, D Khanna1, Karunakaran Balaji3
1Department of Physics, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, India.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
|March 7, 2026
Summary
Optimizing radiation therapy for liver cancer (HCC) shows that 1.25 mm resolution is best for protecting organs at risk. For faster planning and better target coverage, 2.5 mm resolution is optimal using 10X-FFF beams.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy Planning
Background:
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a key treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
- Flattening-filter-free (FFF) photon beams offer dosimetric advantages in SBRT.
- The impact of varying optimization and calculation resolutions on SBRT plan quality for HCC requires detailed evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the influence of different optimization and calculation resolutions on SBRT plan quality for HCC.
- To compare the dosimetric outcomes and plan quality between 6X-FFF and 10X-FFF beams.
- To determine the optimal resolution settings for liver SBRT.
Main Methods:
- SBRT plans were generated for 15 HCC patients using Eclipse TPS with 6X-FFF and 10X-FFF beams.
- Four resolution combinations (1.25 mm and 2.5 mm for optimization and calculation) were tested.
- Plans were evaluated based on PTV coverage, organs at risk (OARs) sparing, delivery efficiency, and a composite plan quality score.
Main Results:
- 10X-FFF beams demonstrated superior performance compared to 6X-FFF beams.
- The 1.25 mm optimization/1.25 mm calculation (O1.25-C1.25) plan excelled in OAR sparing.
- The 1.25 mm optimization/2.5 mm calculation (O1.25-C2.5) plan showed better PTV coverage, while 2.5 mm resolution plans generally reduced planning and calculation times.
Conclusions:
- For liver SBRT with 10X-FFF beams, 1.25 mm resolution for both optimization and calculation is recommended when prioritizing OAR sparing.
- A 2.5 mm resolution setting is considered optimal for liver SBRT when faster planning and calculation times are desired, balancing plan quality.
- The choice of resolution depends on the specific clinical priorities for HCC treatment planning.

