Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: Therapeutic Benefit of Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation in Depression Treatment
Published on: July 7, 2023
Using machine learning to reveal two distinct neuroanatomical subtypes of first-episode, drug-naïve major depressive
Songhao Hu1, Xingyue Zuo2, Jiaqi Huang3
1Affiliated Psychological Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei Fourth People's Hospital, Hefei, 230022, China; School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, China; The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders and Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100088, China.
Background:
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly heterogeneous condition, complicating biomarker discovery and precision medicine. Identifying biologically distinct subtypes using structural MRI (sMRI) offers a promising approach to address this heterogeneity. This study employed sMRI features to define neuroimaging-based subtypes in first-episode, drug-naïve (FEDN) MDD patients.
Methods:
In this study, we analyzed T1-weighted anatomical images from 169 first-episode, drug-naïve (FEDN) MDD patients and 169 healthy controls (HCs) obtained from the rest-meta-MDD project. Patient symptom severity was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) and its subscales. We employed region-specific gray matter volume (GMV) feature-based heterogeneity through discriminant analysis (HYDRA) to explore neuroanatomical subtypes of FEDN MDD patients and validate their stability. Furthermore, we examined demographic and symptomatic differences between identified subtypes.
Results:
We identified two distinct neuroanatomical subtypes of FEDN MDD patients (FEDN MDD 1: n = 85, FEDN MDD 2: n = 84), which exhibited significant differences in GMV alterations. Compared with HCs, FEDN MDD 1 showed widespread GMV increases, while FEDN MDD 2 demonstrated significant GMV reductions. These two subtypes also demonstrated significant differences in HAMD anxiety/somatization subscale scores (t = 2.845, p < 0.01) and age distribution (t = 3.886, p < 0.001). Furthermore, reproducibility analyses confirmed the robustness of these subtypes.
Conclusions:
Our findings revealed two clinically significant neuroanatomical subtypes of MDD, providing new insights into the neurobiological heterogeneity of this disorder. These findings may serve as a valuable reference for future precision diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Depressive Disorders: Etiology
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...
Antidepressant Drugs: Overview
Antidepressant Drugs: MAOIs and Other Agents
Depressive Disorders: MDD and Dysthymia
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena

