Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

08:39
Ferric Chloride-induced Canine Carotid Artery Thrombosis: A Large Animal Model of Vascular Injury
Published on: September 7, 2018
9.7K
Comparison of the Calibrated Automated Thrombogram Using Standard and Low Plasma Volumes in Dogs
Erin M Phillips1, Shauna L Blois1, Gabrielle Monteith1
1Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Veterinary Clinical Pathology
|March 7, 2026
Summary
A new low-volume calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) method effectively assesses thrombin generation in dogs. This reduced-volume approach offers a viable alternative to standard CAT, minimizing patient sampling burden.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Hematology
- Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research
- Clinical Pathology
Background:
- Calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) is crucial for assessing thrombin generation.
- Standard CAT requires significant plasma and reagent volumes (80μL and 20μL, respectively).
- Reducing sample volume is beneficial for veterinary patients, minimizing invasiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the standard CAT method with a novel low-volume CAT method in dogs.
- To evaluate the efficacy of reduced plasma and reagent volumes in thrombin generation assessment.
Main Methods:
- Platelet-poor plasma samples were collected from dogs with varying thrombin generation potentials.
- Method 1 (Standard CAT): 80μL plasma, 20μL reagent.
- Method 2 (Low-Volume CAT): 40μL plasma, 10μL reagent. Assessed parameters included lag time, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), peak, and time to peak (ttpeak).
Main Results:
- Excellent agreement was observed between standard and low-volume CAT methods for all assessed parameters (Lin's concordance coefficients > 0.94).
- A minor bias was noted, significantly affecting lag time.
- A predictive linear equation was established to convert low-volume CAT results to standard CAT values.
- Both methods demonstrated comparable variation in measuring thrombin generation variables.
Conclusions:
- Low-volume CAT is a reliable alternative to the standard method for assessing thrombin generation in dogs.
- This method reduces the sampling burden for canine patients.
- Further validation in larger cohorts is warranted.

