Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

505
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
505
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

560
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
560
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

530
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
530
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

1.1K
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
1.1K
Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

7.2K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
7.2K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

919
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
919

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiple Marginalization: Quantifying Intersectional Inequalities in Utilization of Dental Care.

Journal of public health dentistry·2026
Same author

Cohort and Case-Control Studies: Strengths, Limitations and Methodological Considerations.

Journal of periodontal research·2026
Same author

Is intersectionality selective? The role of collider bias.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same author

Ranking group-level outcomes with multilevel models: An information-theoretic measure of statistical separation.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same author

Intersections of Class and Colonisation: Access to Dental Care for Indigenous Peoples in Canada.

Community dentistry and oral epidemiology·2026
Same author

Beyond additive risk: Intersectional inequalities in sexual violence by sex, race and ethnicity, and sexual orientation.

Child abuse & neglect·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K

Reweighting intersectionality: Statistical and epistemic alignment in intersectional MAIHDA.

Nasir Z Bashir1

  • 1MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, United Kingdom.

Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|March 8, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) quantifies health disparities but its statistical methods may misrepresent real-world population distributions. Researchers should interpret MAIHDA findings cautiously as descriptive tools for stratified heterogeneity.

Keywords:
IntersectionalityMAIHDAMultilevel modelsSocial epidemiologyStatistics

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Social Epidemiology
  • Health Disparities Research
  • Quantitative Social Science

Background:

  • Intersectionality is a key framework for understanding how multiple social identities impact health outcomes.
  • Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) is a statistical method used to operationalize intersectionality in social epidemiology.
  • MAIHDA models within- and between-stratum variation to quantify heterogeneity while addressing sparse data through partial pooling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the epistemic commitments and assumptions embedded within the statistical structure and interpretation of MAIHDA.
  • To question whether MAIHDA's shrinkage and reweighting procedures accurately reflect empirical population distributions.
  • To guide the appropriate use and interpretation of MAIHDA metrics, such as the variance partition coefficient and proportional change in variance, in intersectionality research.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical analysis of the MAIHDA framework.
  • Epistemic critique of MAIHDA's assumptions regarding population representation and effect estimation.
  • Evaluation of variance partition coefficient and proportional change in variance metrics for intersectional analysis.

Main Results:

  • MAIHDA's shrinkage induces implicit reweighting, causing estimated between-stratum variation to reflect a hypothetical population rather than the empirical one.
  • This statistical artifact raises concerns about the accurate interpretation of stratum-level effects in real-world populations.
  • Observed heterogeneity in MAIHDA is underdetermined by theory, potentially aligning with multiple explanatory frameworks beyond intersectionality.

Conclusions:

  • MAIHDA should be primarily viewed as a descriptive tool for identifying stratified heterogeneity.
  • Its findings can offer empirical guidance on the relevance of intersectional explanations but require openness to alternative theoretical interpretations.
  • Researchers must engage in careful epistemic reflection regarding the assumptions and inferences when applying MAIHDA to intersectionality-motivated research.