Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Fixed Volume or Fixed Pressure: A Murine Model of Hemorrhagic Shock
Published on: June 6, 2011
Rethinking Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock: A Phase-Adapted, Endothelium-Sparing Approach to Mitigate Capillary
1Department of Intensive Care Unit, The People's Hospital Medical Group of Xiangzhou, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Abstract:
Sepsis-induced endothelial dysfunction and the resultant capillary leak syndrome are defining features of septic shock, posing a profound challenge to conventional fluid resuscitation strategies. The long-standing debate over crystalloid versus colloid administration is evolving beyond a simple dichotomy toward a more nuanced, physiologically informed approach. This review critically examines the pathophysiological cascade driving vascular hyperpermeability in sepsis-from endothelial glycocalyx degradation and inflammatory cytokine storms to oxidative stress and nitric oxide dysregulation. We trace the evolution of resuscitation paradigms from early goal-directed therapy to modern conservative approaches, highlighting the limitations of crystalloid-dominant protocols, including intravascular volume depletion despite a positive fluid balance and iatrogenic organ injury. Drawing on evidence from landmark clinical trials (eg, ALBIOS, CRISTAL, SMART) and a pharmacological reappraisal of fluid properties, we argue that a one-size-fits-all strategy is obsolete. Instead, this narrative review synthesizes recent trial evidence and pathophysiological insights to propose the Phase-Adapted, Endothelium-Sparing (PAES) resuscitation strategy, a novel framework that tailors fluid type and volume to the distinct temporal phases of septic shock: Rescue, Optimization, Stabilization, and De-escalation. This model advocates for initial resuscitation with balanced crystalloids, followed by the judicious integration of albumin in specific, high-risk patient subgroups to leverage its unique oncotic and pleiotropic, endothelium-stabilizing effects. We further outline how dynamic hemodynamic monitoring, point-of-care ultrasound, and emerging biomarkers of endothelial injury (eg, syndecan-1, angiopoietin-2) can guide the real-time implementation of this personalized strategy. The PAES framework aims to uncouple macrohemodynamic stabilization from microcirculatory injury, offering a pragmatic pathway to optimize perfusion, mitigate capillary leak, and improve outcomes in this critically ill population.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

