Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Cross-technique transfer learning to predict the dose distribution for radiotherapy planning based on a limited
Xiaohong Wang1, Ke Wang1, Jialin Ding1
1National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Background:
Accurate dose prediction is challenged by the lack of available training samples and the rapid evolution of radiotherapy techniques.
Purpose:
A cross-technique transfer learning strategy was developed to predict the dose distribution for radiotherapy planning using limited training samples.
Methods:
Data were collected from 154 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: 60 treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and 94 treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The Res-U Net was selected as the base deep learning network. Cross-technique models were pretrained on the IMRT dataset and subsequently fine-tuned on VMAT data using limited samples (five and seven cases). Independent models were trained from scratch using the same limited samples, while a standard model trained on the full VMAT training set served as the reference. Model performance was evaluated on a test set using metrics including the dose-volume histogram (DVH), voxel-based mean absolute error (MAE), and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the isodose volume.
Results:
The cross-technique models exhibited clinically acceptable performance with only five training samples and were comparable to the standard model (MAE deviation: 0.15%, p > 0.01 after Bonferroni correction; DSC deviation: 0.11%-0.72%). Performance improved further with seven training samples (MAE deviation: 0.05%, p > 0.01; DSC deviation: 0.02%-0.40%). However, the independent models trained with five or seven samples showed significantly inferior performance (five samples: MAE deviation: 1.14%, p < 0.01, DSC deviation: 0.98%-2.48%; seven samples: MAE deviation: 0.50%, p < 0.01, DSC deviation: 0.48%-1.05%).
Conclusion:
The cross-technique models accurately and reliably predicted the dose distribution for a new radiotherapy technique using a limited sample size.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
05:18Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
Published on: October 6, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Dosage Regimen Designs: Nomograms and Tabulations
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Repetitive IV Injections
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses