Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
Published on: May 30, 2019
A centripetally rotating implant scan body concept for complete-arch scanning: An in vitro study
Gennaro Ruggiero1, Roberto Sorrentino1, Fanny Ficuciello2
1Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics, Scientific Unit of Digital Dentistry, University "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Objectives:
To assess the in vitro metrological performance of a centripetally rotating implant scan body (ISB) system (GeoXact®), designed to standardize scan-body orientation and create a compact concentric reference geometry to mitigate cumulative stitching drift during complete-arch implant scanning on multi-unit abutments (MUAs), and to investigate site-related effects.
Methods:
A maxillary resin cast with four implant sites restored with MUAs was digitized with an industrial optical scanner to generate the reference STL. GeoXact® ISBs were rotated into a centripetal contact configuration to standardize orientation and reduce inter-ISB spacing. Twenty complete-arch scans were acquired with an intraoral scanner (Primescan 2; Dentsply Sirona) by capturing only a partial portion of each ISB head (≥3 planar faces) along the contact chain. Experimental datasets were generated by CAD library replacement. Each dataset was rigidly aligned to the reference using ICP in CloudCompare (global registration). Global mean deviation was computed after global alignment; site-level mean deviations were computed under the same global transformation (no additional per-MUA best-fit), whereas per-MUA rigid alignment was used only to extract translational and angular parameters. Outcomes were global mean deviation, mean deviation per MUA, translational magnitude, angular deviation, Δ interimplant distance, and scanning time.
Results:
Global mean deviation was 0.009 ±0.005 mm (n = 20). Mean deviation per MUA was 0.010 ±0.011 mm (n = 80). Translational magnitude and angular deviation averaged 0.064 ±0.092 mm and 0.203 ±0.165°, respectively. Mean Δ interimplant distance was 0.003 ±0.007 mm overall; the distal site showed the largest mean (0.008 ±0.011 mm). Mean scanning time was approximately 9 seconds.
Conclusions:
Under controlled in vitro conditions, the tested ISB workflow enabled rapid complete-arch acquisition with small 3D pose deviations on MUAs and limited site-related effects mainly at the distal implant position.
Clinical Significance:
In this in vitro model, the GeoXact® centripetal configuration enabled a compact reference geometry and rapid complete-arch acquisition with small metrological deviations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Fundamental Principles
Accelerated...
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Overview of Microscopy Techniques
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...

