Diffusion MRI sampling schemes bias diffusion metrics and tractography

Ivanei Bramati1,2, Diego Szczupak2,3, Marina Carneiro Monteiro1

  • 1Department of Brain Connectivity and Plasticity, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Different diffusion MRI sampling schemes create systematic biases in white matter analysis. Harmonization methods are needed to combine data from diverse protocols for accurate brain architecture studies.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Diffusion MRI
  • White Matter Anatomy

Background:

  • Diffusion MRI is vital for studying white matter architecture.
  • Tractography and diffusion metrics can be influenced by varying sampling schemes.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for reliable data interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess systematic differences in diffusion MRI metrics and tractography across four common protocols: single-shell HARDI, Siemens multi-shell (Sms), DSI, and HCP multi-shell (HCPms).
  • To evaluate these differences in healthy adults and individuals with corpus callosum dysgenesis (CCD).

Main Methods:

  • Acquired data on a 3T scanner and processed uniformly.
  • Extracted fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), effective contrast-to-noise ratio (eCNR), and orientation dispersion.
  • Measured tract volumes and streamline counts in specific white matter regions (CC, CR, CSO, AC, PC) and CCD-specific bundles (Probst, sigmoid).

Main Results:

  • FA and MD showed moderate correlations across schemes, but matched means were infrequent.
  • eCNR and dispersion had limited cross-scheme correlations, with some similarities between Sms/HCPms and HARDI/DSI/HCPms.
  • Tract volumes correlated across Sms, DSI, and HCPms for CC (controls) and CCD bundles; DSI and HCPms showed consistent volumes.
  • Sms volumes agreed with DSI/HCPms in CR but were lower in CC and CCD ROIs; HARDI produced higher volumes in CC, CR, and CCD ROIs.
  • AC and PC tract metrics were consistent across schemes, but correlations varied.

Conclusions:

  • Four diffusion-sampling schemes exhibit systematic differences in voxel-wise metrics and tractography outcomes.
  • Findings inform efforts to consolidate or contrast data across schemes.
  • Future research should explore harmonization methods to reduce bias and enable pooled analyses across diverse protocols.