Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a matched study in pediatric cases at a single center

In the past decade, advancements in robotic surgery have significantly expanded its application into diverse fields, including urological, gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and gynecological procedures. However, comparative outcome data between robotic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in pediatric patients are scarce. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of robotic cholecystectomy (RC) by comparing its outcomes with those of LC.

A retrospective study was conducted using patient records from a single institution involving individuals who underwent RC or LC. Patients who had undergone open cholecystectomy or previous open abdominal surgeries were excluded. Matching criteria included operative age, body mass index, and total bilirubin levels. Baseline and outcome variables were compared using appropriate statistical tests to assess significance.

Groups were well-matched for demographic variables. Regression-adjusted analysis showed no significant difference in operative time between RC and LC and hospital stay length (P > 0.05). Complication rates were higher in the RC group (25.0% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.040) and analgesic use was significantly higher in the RC group (adjusted odds ratio, ∞; P < 0.001), as all RC patients received postoperative analgesics.

The baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were well-matched. While most outcomes showed no statistically significant differences, the RC group had significantly higher postoperative analgesic use and complication rates. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and further studies to evaluate the safety profile of RC in pediatric patients.