Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

15.6K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
15.6K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

9.0K
9.0K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.3K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.3K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

5.9K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
5.9K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

4.2K
4.2K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

15.5K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
15.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The correlation between the deterioration of microstructural evolution and mechanical properties in human ascending aortas with and without dissections.

Acta biomaterialia·2026
Same author

Experiences and Perspectives of Nursing Students and Educators on Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.

Nurse educator·2026
Same author

Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Patient Selection, Procedural Pearls, and Expected Outcomes.

Seminars in interventional radiology·2025
Same author

The two-component nuclease-active KELShedu system confers broad antiphage activity via abortive infection.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Efficacy and safety of 570/590 Nm yellow light combined with red light and infrared LED in treating facial skin photoaging: A Single-Center, randomized Controlled, exploratory study.

Lasers in medical science·2025
Same author

Study on Nano-Grinding Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Subsurface Damage in Monocrystalline Silicon.

Micromachines·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.9K

Molecular embedding-based algorithm selection in protein-ligand docking.

Jiabao Brad Wang1, Siyuan Cao1, Hongxuan Wu1

  • 1Division of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, 8 Duke Av., Suzhou, 215316, Jiangsu, China.

Journal of Cheminformatics
|March 15, 2026
PubMed
Summary

MolAS, a new algorithm-selection model, improves molecular docking performance by predicting per-algorithm effectiveness. It offers significant gains over the single best solver (SBS) and helps close the gap to the virtual best solver (VBS).

Keywords:
Algorithm selectionCheminformaticsDocking benchmarksMolecular embeddingsPose evaluationProtein-ligand docking

More Related Videos

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.5K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.9K
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.5K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Machine learning in bioinformatics

Background:

  • Molecular docking algorithm selection is challenging due to context-dependent performance.
  • No single algorithm reliably performs across all structural, chemical, and protocol variations.
  • Existing methods often lack adaptability and generalizability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce MolAS, a lightweight algorithm-selection model for molecular docking.
  • To predict per-algorithm performance using pretrained protein and ligand embeddings.
  • To improve upon the single best solver (SBS) and approach the virtual best solver (VBS) performance.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized pretrained protein and ligand embeddings.
  • Employed attentional pooling and a shallow residual decoder for performance prediction.
  • Evaluated MolAS across five molecular docking benchmarks with hundreds to thousands of labeled complexes.

Main Results:

  • MolAS achieved up to a 15 percentage-point absolute improvement over the single best solver (SBS).
  • The model closed 17-66% of the gap between the virtual best solver (VBS) and SBS.
  • Performance was most effective with low oracle entropy and separable top-solver regions, but degraded under protocol mismatch.

Conclusions:

  • MolAS offers a robust, embedding-based approach to docking algorithm selection.
  • Its effectiveness is linked to oracle landscape characteristics and protocol stability.
  • The model serves as an in-domain selector and a diagnostic tool for assessing selection well-posedness.