Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Systematic Approach to Identify Novel Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Molecules from Plants' Extracts and Fractions to Prevent Dental Caries
Published on: March 31, 2021
The pitfalls of conventional methods of screening for systematic reviews: Lessons learned
Mohammad Mahdi Bagheri Asl1, Alejandro M Spiotta2
1Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Selective reporting in Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (SRMAs) causes bias. This study proposes solutions to make all findings, including nonsignificant outcomes, searchable to improve evidence quality.
Area of Science:
- Medical research methodology
- Evidence-based medicine
Background:
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (SRMAs) are high-level evidence but susceptible to bias.
- Nonsignificant or secondary outcomes are often omitted from abstracts, creating a "file drawer problem".
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the inaccessibility of nonsignificant outcomes in SRMAs.
- To propose recommendations for improving the discoverability of all study findings.
Main Methods:
- Recommendations developed for primary study researchers, secondary study researchers, and journals/databases.
- Focus on enhancing database searchability for full-text findings.
Main Results:
- Selective reporting leads to overestimated treatment effects and biased complication rates in SRMAs.
- Current academic databases do not index full-text content, hindering access to unpublished or omitted findings.
Conclusions:
- Collaborative stakeholder efforts are needed to improve accessibility of nonsignificant outcomes.
- Enhanced searchability of all findings will reduce bias in evidence synthesis and inform clinical guidelines.
- Addressing this issue is crucial for accurate patient care and reliable clinical decision-making.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Blind Procedures
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

