Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
Exploring AI-driven deep learning approaches for optimizing space detection in single gap implantation based on CBCT
Pattarapong Anupuntanun1, Sirida Arunjaroensuk1, Walita Narkbuakaew2
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Digital Implant Surgery Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Objective:
Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) is a valuable tool for improving implantation accuracy and efficiency, but its clinical implementation remains time consuming and relies on expert experience, particularly for anatomical structure annotation. While AI-driven analysis offers a solution, limited studies have assessed its use for evaluating single edentulous regions. To address this gap, this study introduces a novel, simple, three-step sequential approach for automated detection of single edentulous areas and adjacent structures, leveraging structure segmentation from the nnUNet-based DentalSegmentator framework without requiring further manual segmentation.
Methods:
Sixty-six cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans, acquired from four different machines and encompassing a total of 80 single edentulous regions, were divided into parameter tuning and validation cohorts. Anatomical structures were first segmented using the DentalSegmentator with the available pre-trained model. Subsequently, detection was computed using morphological image processing, the Watershed algorithm, particle analysis, and a decision tree. Performance was validated against the annotations of three experienced dentists using accuracy, precision, recall, specificity and F1-score. Finally, computational time was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p < 0.001).
Results:
The approach achieved high performance, with accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1-score values of 0.95, 0.95, 0.96, 0.93, and 0.96, respectively. The automated detection time (3.3 s) represents a 37-fold reduction in processing time compared to experts (120 s).
Conclusions:
The proposed automated detection approach demonstrated reliability, time efficiency, and consistency, positioning it as a valuable asset for pre-surgical implant planning.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

