Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

44.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
44.0K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

95.9K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
95.9K
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

16.0K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
16.0K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.9K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.9K
Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

362
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
362

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and Validation of a UPLC-MS/MS for Determination of Loureirin D in Rat Plasma and Its Application to Pharmacokinetics.

Biomedical chromatography : BMC·2026
Same author

Quantification of Bullatine A and Bullatine B in Rat Plasma Using UPLC-MS/MS and Application to Pharmacokinetics.

Biomedical chromatography : BMC·2026
Same author

A Validated UPLC-MS/MS Assay for Isosakuranetin Determination in Rat Plasma and Its Application to Pharmacokinetics.

Biomedical chromatography : BMC·2026
Same author

Advancing solar and wind penetration in China through energy complementarity.

Nature·2026
Same author

Discovery of Novel Heterotetracyclic DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase (DNA-PK) Inhibitors with Improved Oral Bioavailability and Potent Cancer Immunotherapy-Potentiating Activity.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Discovery of potent bifunctional small molecules targeting DNA-PK and HDAC6 with desirable pharmacokinetic properties for acute myeloid leukemia treatment.

European journal of medicinal chemistry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

11.0K

On Demographic Group Fairness Guarantees in Deep Learning.

Yan Luo, Congcong Wen, Min Shi

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
    |March 16, 2026
    PubMed
    Summary

    Data distribution differences significantly impact deep learning fairness. Our framework and Fairness-Aware Regularization (FAR) improve equitable AI performance by minimizing inter-group discrepancies.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 6, 2026

    Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
    13:19

    Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

    Published on: March 13, 2021

    11.0K

    Area of Science:

    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Machine Learning
    • Computer Science

    Background:

    • Deep learning models often exhibit fairness disparities across demographic groups.
    • Data distribution heterogeneity is a key factor contributing to these fairness gaps.
    • Existing fairness guarantees may not adequately address distributional shifts.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a theoretical framework for analyzing the relationship between data distributions and fairness in deep learning.
    • To derive theoretical bounds for fairness errors and convergence rates considering data heterogeneity.
    • To propose and validate a practical method for improving equitable performance in deep learning models.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a theoretical framework with novel bounds for fairness errors and convergence rates.
    • Analyzed the impact of distributional differences on the fairness-accuracy trade-off.
    • Conducted extensive experiments on diverse datasets across image, tabular, and text modalities.
    • Proposed and implemented Fairness-Aware Regularization (FAR) to minimize inter-group feature discrepancies.

    Main Results:

    • Demonstrated that feature distribution differences across demographic groups significantly impact model fairness, especially for racial categories.
    • Validated theoretical findings with empirical observations across multiple datasets and modalities.
    • Showed that FAR consistently improves overall AUC, ES-AUC, and subgroup performance.
    • Confirmed that distributional shifts are a fundamental limit to achieving fairness in deep learning.

    Conclusions:

    • Data distribution heterogeneity is a critical factor affecting AI fairness.
    • Theoretical insights into feature distribution shifts can guide the development of more equitable algorithms.
    • Fairness-Aware Regularization (FAR) is an effective practical approach to enhance fairness in deep learning.