Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
Published on: November 7, 2025
Navigating prostate cancer together: Partner involvement in shared decision-making
M B Josefsen1, B Nørby2, K D Steffensen3
1Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Objectives:
Relatives often participate in medical decision-making, yet many report feeling excluded rather than meaningfully involved. Research indicates that when relatives are actively engaged in patient care - aligned with their abilities and needs - it can enhance patient adherence, safety, and the overall experience for both patients and their relatives. Despite this, their role in Shared Decision-Making (SDM) remains underexplored. This study examines perceptions of meaningful partner involvement in medical decision-making during hospital consultations with prostate cancer patients.
Methods:
This qualitative study (N = 72) draws on field notes, focus group and individual interviews, and handwritten workshop responses. Participants include doctors, nurses, patients, and relatives, selected through purposive sampling. As partners comprised the majority of relatives present during consultations, the study focused on their experiences through interviews and workshops. All data sources strive to capture decision-making moments during consultations, using a hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to explore participants' lived experiences.
Results:
The first key finding, 'Roles', underscores the crucial contributions partners make during consultations and throughout the disease trajectory around medical decision-making. The roles are illustrated by four sub-themes: 'listening', 'remembering', 'taking responsibility', 'being supportive'. The second finding, 'Mindsets', reveals that partners and patients approach decision-making with different perspectives, either exhibiting a 'worried and skeptical' or 'positive' mindset, while others display a 'need for knowledge' or 'reserved' attitude.
Conclusion:
Partners play a crucial role in a patient's journey through illness and in decision-making discussions. However, their own needs should be acknowledged and addressed throughout this process. Doctors and nurses need to be mindful of this dynamic during consultations.
Practice Implications:
The findings offer valuable insight for doctors and nurses to enhance decision-making conversations involving relatives, extending their applicability beyond prostate cancer to other medical conditions.
More Related Videos
07:25A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
13:19Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Disorders of the Male Reproductive System
Prostate disorders are another major concern. These conditions can impair urinary flow due to the prostate's location around the urethra....
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Prevention
Patient-centered Care
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...