Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.1K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

12.1K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
12.1K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.8K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.8K
Archival Research01:40

Archival Research

17.5K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
17.5K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

274.4K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
274.4K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

66.9K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
66.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural signatures of model-based and model-free reinforcement learning across prefrontal cortex and striatum.

eLife·2026
Same author

Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention among Latinas in the U.S. among a Network of Community Health Centers.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Native American Women's Willingness to Screen for Both Cervical and Colorectal Cancer at Home.

Cancer medicine·2026
Same author

Flexible neural representations of abstract structural knowledge in the human entorhinal cortex.

eLife·2026
Same author

Single amino-acid differences define H2B variants and modify chromatin accessibility to induce EMT in breast cancer.

Oncogene·2026
Same author

Linker histone H1.5 contributes to centromere integrity.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Estimating probabilities of malaria importation in southern Mozambique through modelling <i>P. falciparum</i> genomics and mobility patterns.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Conformational variability of HIV-1 Env trimer and viral vulnerability.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Disinformation elicits learning biases.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Correction: Generation of a transparent killifish line through multiplex CRISPR/Cas9mediated gene inactivation.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Differential regulation of hepatic macrophage fate by Chi3l1 in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Deciphering interferon functions in avian influenza using receptor knockout models in the natural host.

eLife·2026
See all related articles
  1. Home
  3. Rethinking How Research Is Reviewed And Published.
  1. Home
  3. Rethinking How Research Is Reviewed And Published.

Related Experiment Video

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
05:10

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System

Published on: December 11, 2016

10.3K

Rethinking how research is reviewed and published.

Timothy E Behrens1, Yamini Dalal1, Diane M Harper1

  • 1eLife, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Elife
|March 17, 2026

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

eLife journal adopted a novel publishing model, leading to its impact factor loss. Despite this, authors, reviewers, editors, and funders back the journal's reform efforts in scientific publishing.

Keywords:
peer reviewpreprintspublish-review-curateresearch assessmentscientific publishing

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.7K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
05:10

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System

Published on: December 11, 2016

10.3K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.7K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.7K

Area of Science:

  • Scholarly publishing
  • Scientific communication

Background:

  • The traditional impact factor system is criticized for potential biases.
  • eLife journal initiated a radical reform of its publishing process.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the consequences of eLife's new publishing model.
  • To gauge the support for scientific publishing reform.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of journal metrics and community feedback.
  • Monitoring of author, reviewer, editor, and funder responses.

Main Results:

  • eLife lost its impact factor following the implementation of a new publishing approach.
  • Significant support for eLife's reform initiatives was observed from key stakeholders.

Conclusions:

  • Radical changes in publishing can impact traditional metrics like impact factor.
  • Stakeholder support is crucial for the success of publishing reform efforts in science.