Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Updating the Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) Reporting Guidelines: Protocol for a Methodological
Sarah Munce1, Sergi Fàbregues2, Quan Nha Hong3,4
1Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Bloorview Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
This study updates the Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) guidelines to enhance the quality and transparency of mixed methods research in health services. The new GRAMMS 2.0 will improve reporting consistency and clarity for researchers and knowledge users.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Methodology
- Scientific Reporting
Background:
- Mixed methods research (MMR) integrates qualitative and quantitative approaches for deeper understanding but often lacks consistent integration in reporting.
- The original Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) guidelines (2008) are outdated due to rapid advancements in MMR.
- A persistent gap in the implementation of integration in MMR reporting has existed for nearly two decades.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an updated GRAMMS 2.0 guideline and checklist for improved reporting of MMR in health services research.
- Enhance consistency, transparency, and quality in reporting mixed methods studies.
- Address the evolving landscape of mixed methods research and its application in health.
Main Methods:
- A methodological review to identify relevant reporting criteria from the mixed methods literature.
- A modified Delphi approach and consensus meeting to prioritize components for the updated GRAMMS 2.0 guideline.
Main Results:
- The project has secured funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for April 2025.
- The methodological review and Delphi process are underway to inform the development of GRAMMS 2.0.
Conclusions:
- The GRAMMS 2.0 guideline aims to significantly improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of MMR reporting.
- It will benefit researchers, knowledge users, peer reviewers, and editors, enhancing the clarity and transferability of findings.
- Ultimately, GRAMMS 2.0 will facilitate more efficient use of mixed methods research in health, optimizing research investments.
More Related Videos
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Group Design
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include: