PRISMA and PRISMA-ScR Reporting Guidelines.

Area of Science:

• Evidence-based practice
• Scientific publishing
• Health research methodology

Background:

• Effective dissemination of research findings is crucial for evidence-based healthcare.
• Systematic reviews offer the highest level of evidence but present challenges in conduct and publication.
• This work introduces the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and its extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

Purpose of the Study:

• To provide an overview of PRISMA and PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
• To emphasize the importance of standardized reporting in systematic reviews.
• To highlight the benefits of adhering to reporting guidelines for research quality and dissemination.

Main Methods:

• Overview of PRISMA statement.
• Explanation of PRISMA-ScR extension for scoping reviews.
• Discussion of the impact of reporting guidelines on research integrity.

Main Results:

• PRISMA and PRISMA-ScR guidelines promote transparency and reproducibility in systematic reviews.
• Adherence to these guidelines enhances the assessment of study quality and applicability for end-users.
• Failure to follow guidelines can lead to reduced scientific rigor and potential patient harm.

Conclusions:

• Following PRISMA and PRISMA-ScR guidelines is essential for scientific rigor and transparency.
• These guidelines facilitate trust and aid clinicians and policymakers in evaluating research.
• Adherence ensures high-quality research, optimal outcomes, and prevents wasted resources.