Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

08:54
Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018
15.1K
Radiotherapy Utilization Patterns Among Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma of the Spine: A National Claims
Tobechukwu C Ndika1, Emily J Luo1, Joshua Woo1
1Duke University School of Medicine.
American Journal of Clinical Oncology
|March 17, 2026
Summary
Conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) remains dominant for spinal metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Sociodemographic factors influence stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) use, with trends showing decreased SBRT post-2019.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiation Oncology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Spinal metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) present a significant clinical challenge.
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers a precise, high-dose radiation option for these lesions.
- Understanding patterns of care and predictors of SBRT use is crucial for optimizing treatment delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify sociodemographic factors associated with the utilization of SBRT for spinal metastatic RCC.
- To analyze temporal trends in first-line SBRT use in relation to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline updates.
- To investigate potential disparities in SBRT access and utilization.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the PearlDiver Database (2010-2023) for adult patients with spinal mRCC.
- Categorization of patients into SBRT and conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) cohorts based on first-line radiotherapy.
- Statistical comparison using chi-squared and independent-samples t tests; multivariate logistic regression for predictor analysis.
Main Results:
- EBRT was the predominant first-line treatment for spinal mRCC (10,535 EBRT vs. 453 SBRT).
- Younger age, male sex, commercial insurance, and Midwest/Northeast residence predicted higher SBRT utilization.
- SBRT use declined after 2019, with EBRT consistently exceeding SBRT annually.
Conclusions:
- Conventional EBRT remains the standard of care for first-line treatment of spinal mRCC.
- Payer mechanisms and regional variations likely influence SBRT adoption, highlighting potential access barriers.
- Policy adjustments and infrastructure development are needed to improve equitable SBRT access aligned with evidence.

