Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

A Syngeneic Mouse Model of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma for Quantitative and Longitudinal Assessment of Preclinical Therapies
Published on: April 12, 2017
Initial and Repeat Metastasis-Directed Therapy in Systemic Therapy-Naïve Oligometastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma:
Jiwoong Yu1, Jong Yun Baek2, Wan Song1
1Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Introduction:
Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) offers the potential to delay systemic treatment in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (OM-RCC); however, outcomes in clinical practice, particularly with repeat MDT in patients naïve to systemic therapy, are not well characterized.
Patients And Methods:
We analyzed 133 patients with OM-RCC who were naïve to systemic therapy (with up to five lesions) and treated with MDT: metastasectomy, stereotactic body radiotherapy, or radiofrequency ablation. In total, 38 patients underwent a second MDT for subsequent relapse without systemic therapy. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses evaluated progression-free survival (PFS), systemic therapy-free survival (STFS), and overall survival (OS). A time-varying Cox model accounted for intrapatient correlation when comparing PFS between MDT sessions. A two-factor risk score was constructed using disease-free interval (DFI < 1 year) and metastatic burden (two or more lesions).
Results:
With a median follow-up of 49.8 months, 5-year STFS and OS were 44.9 and 85.0%, respectively. Two-year PFS was similar between the first (47.9%) and second MDT (39.9%, P = 0.996). After the first MDT, DFI < 1 year and two or more lesions independently predicted inferior PFS, STFS, and OS. After the second MDT, only DFI < 1 year remained significant for PFS. The composite risk score, assigning one point each for DFI < 1 year and two or more lesions, effectively stratified outcomes, with 2 year PFS rates of 63.6% (score 0), 33.5% (score 1), and 9.1% (score 2) after the first MDT.
Conclusion:
MDT provides durable disease control and defers systemic therapy in systemic therapy-naïve OM-RCC. Repeat MDT offers comparable outcomes to initial treatment in selected patients. A simple risk score integrating DFI and metastatic burden may guide patient selection and shared decision-making.
Implications For Practice:
In systemic therapy-naïve oligometastatic RCC, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) provides durable systemic therapy-free and overall survival. Repeat MDT, when applied to carefully selected patients, achieves progression control comparable to that of the initial treatment. A simple two-factor risk score incorporating a disease-free interval of < 1 year and ≥ 2 effectively stratifies patients into favorable and poor prognostic groups. This tool offers clinicians a practical means of triaging candidates, optimizing the timing of MDT, and determining when early systemic therapy should be considered.
Insights
Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) effectively delays systemic treatment for oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (OM-RCC). Repeat MDT offers comparable outcomes in selected patients, guided by a risk score integrating disease-free interval and metastatic burden.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Urologic Oncology
- Renal Cell Carcinoma Research
Background:
- Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) shows promise for delaying systemic treatment in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (OM-RCC).
- Real-world outcomes of MDT, especially repeat treatments in treatment-naïve patients, require further characterization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of MDT in systemic therapy-naïve OM-RCC patients.
- To assess outcomes of repeat MDT in patients experiencing relapse without prior systemic therapy.
- To identify predictors of progression and survival following MDT.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 133 systemic therapy-naïve OM-RCC patients treated with MDT (metastasectomy, SBRT, RFA).
- Analysis included 38 patients who received a second MDT for subsequent relapse without systemic therapy.
- Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression, and time-varying Cox models assessed PFS, STFS, and OS. A risk score was developed using DFI (<1 year) and metastatic burden (≥2 lesions).
Main Results:
- Five-year systemic therapy-free survival (STFS) and overall survival (OS) were 44.9% and 85.0%, respectively.
- Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) was similar after the first (47.9%) and second MDT (39.9%).
- A risk score combining DFI < 1 year and ≥2 lesions effectively stratified outcomes after MDT.
Conclusions:
- MDT provides durable disease control and delays systemic therapy in OM-RCC.
- Repeat MDT can achieve comparable progression control to initial treatment in selected patients.
- A simple risk score aids in patient selection and shared decision-making for MDT.
More Related Videos
11:27Modeling Spontaneous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma mRCC in Mice Following Nephrectomy
Published on: April 29, 2014
07:50Utilization of Ultrasound Guided Tissue-directed Cellular Implantation for the Establishment of Biologically Relevant Metastatic Tumor Xenografts
Published on: May 25, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Treatment Resistant Cancers