Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
Published on: August 1, 2017
An emerging training and communication book for first responders in communicating with Deaf people during disasters
Jason Rotoli1, Jeremy Cushman2, Susan Demers3
1University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1251-4469.
Background:
Due to communication barriers, Deaf people are at risk of limited information acquisition during all disaster phases. Communication barriers between emergency first responders (EFRs) and Deaf sign language users perpetuate disaster preparation and response disparities. This study compared pre/post-educational intervention EFR knowledge about Deaf culture and their comfort communicating with Deaf people during (written) disaster scenarios. Additionally, EFRs provided a preliminary acceptability rating of a disaster communication book.
Methods:
This prospective study assessed the impact of an EFR educational intervention and Deaf Communication Catalog (DC3), a comprehensive emergency/disaster communication book designed specifically for improving disaster communication. Key outcomes were assessed at three timepoints: pre-, immediately post-, and 3 months post-educational intervention. Generalized linear models were used to assess changes over time for Likert variables. Descriptive statistics characterized the sample.
Results:
Of the 167 participants, the majority were male (88 percent) and White (91 percent). Immediate post-educational intervention comfort improved for many EFR duties (scale = 1 very uncomfortable, 4 = very comfortable): plan explanation (mean 2.8 vs 3.0, p = .002), disaster explanation (mean 2.9 vs 3.0, p = .017), and determining Deaf people's needs (mean 2.8 vs 3, p = .002). Compared to pre-educational intervention, at 3 months, EFRs were more aware of barriers to communicating information during disasters (p < 0.05) and of greater information loss during disasters with Deaf people (p < 0.02). An increase in Deaf culture knowledge was demonstrated across all three assessments (69 percent vs 88 percent vs 93 percent, p < 0.0001). Nearly all (96 percent) reported DC3 was useful for bridging communication gaps.
Conclusion:
EFRs had Deaf culture knowledge improvements, increased awareness of communication barriers, and improved comfort in communicating with Deaf people during disaster scenarios after an educational training. DC3, a comprehensive emergency/disaster communication book, was reported to be useful in fostering communication with Deaf people.
Related Concept Videos
Communication
Communication
Within...
Therapeutic Communication
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this barrier...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response

