Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Decoding green space supply-demand mismatch through urban morphology: Toward equitable urban planning with
Lijuan Sun1, Wei Liu1, Qiqi Liu2
1College of Horticulture, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.
Urban green spaces (UGS) show significant supply-demand mismatches, with core areas lacking access despite peripheral surpluses. Urban form, not just quantity, drives these green inequities, requiring targeted planning for equitable access.
Area of Science:
- Urban planning and spatial analysis
- Environmental justice and public health
- Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and machine learning
Background:
- Urban green spaces (UGS) are crucial for urban ecological infrastructure, resident well-being, and spatial equity.
- Rapid urbanization causes supply-demand imbalances and "green inequities" in UGS distribution.
- Understanding the spatial drivers of these mismatches is essential for equitable planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify UGS supply, demand, and spatial mismatches in Nanjing's central urban area in 2022.
- To reveal inequities in green resource allocation and accessibility.
- To identify urban morphological drivers influencing UGS supply-demand mismatches using machine learning.
Main Methods:
- Developed a framework to quantify UGS supply, demand, and spatial mismatches.
- Applied an explainable machine learning model (XGBoost-SHAP) to identify drivers.
- Analyzed data for traffic analysis zones (TAZs) in Nanjing's central urban area.
Main Results:
- Significant spatial mismatches were found across all TAZs, with core areas facing deficits and peripheral areas showing surpluses.
- "Quantitative abundance" of UGS did not guarantee "qualitative accessibility" for residents.
- Urban compactness, floor area ratio, road density, and land-use mix negatively impacted UGS supply-demand balance, while public facility coverage and residential land proportion had positive effects.
Conclusions:
- UGS planning must address spatial mismatches and "green inequities" beyond simple area provision.
- Urban morphology significantly influences the effectiveness and equity of UGS distribution.
- Governance strategies should prioritize urban morphology optimization for equitable green space services and environmental justice.
Related Concept Videos
Manipulation and Analysis
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Selected Data About Geographic Locations
Levels of Use of a GIS
Introduction to GIS
Thematic Layering in GIS