Long-Term Results After Senning and Mustard Operations for d-Transposition of the Great Arteries: Atrial Switch

Fabian A Kari1,2,3, Emre Ortac1,2,3, Sebastian G Michel1,2,3

  • 1Department of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery, TUM University Hospital German Heart Center, Munich, 80636, Germany.

Insights

The Senning atrial switch procedure offers better long-term survival than the Mustard procedure for d-transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA). This surgical option remains valuable for late-presenting congenital heart conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Pediatric Cardiology
  • Congenital Heart Disease

Background:

  • Atrial switch procedures (Senning and Mustard) were standard for d-transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA).
  • These procedures carry long-term risks associated with a systemic right ventricle.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate long-term outcomes of Senning and Mustard atrial switch procedures.
  • To compare survival rates and reoperation frequencies between the two surgical techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective follow-up study of 417 patients with d-TGA treated between 1974-2001.
  • Analysis focused on survival, baffle-related, and non-baffle-related reoperations.
  • Median follow-up duration was 34.2 years.

Main Results:

  • Overall 40-year survival was 78.3%.
  • Senning procedure showed superior 40-year survival (81.6%) compared to Mustard (66.7%) (p<0.001).
  • Freedom from reoperation at 40 years was 73.1%.

Conclusions:

  • The Senning procedure demonstrates superior long-term survival compared to the Mustard procedure.
  • Senning offers survival rates only slightly inferior to the general population up to the fifth decade.
  • The Senning operation should be maintained for late presentations of d-TGA and related conditions.
Abstract