Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Coronary Sinus Reduction for REDUCER-I Patients With Refractory Angina and Angiographically Nonobstructive Coronary
Ranil de Silva1, Tim P van de Hoef2, Jan-Peter van Kuijk3
1Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Part of Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Trust and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Insights
The coronary sinus (CS) Reducer effectively treated refractory angina (RA) in patients with angiographically nonobstructive coronary artery disease (AngioNOCAD). This therapy improved symptoms and quality of life for patients with no other revascularization options.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Refractory angina (RA) is common in patients with angiographically nonobstructive coronary artery disease (AngioNOCAD).
- These patients often have limited revascularization options.
- Previous successful revascularization does not preclude RA in AngioNOCAD patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the coronary sinus (CS) Reducer device.
- To assess treatment outcomes for AngioNOCAD patients with refractory angina.
- To determine if CS Reducer is a viable option for patients lacking further revascularization strategies.
Main Methods:
- The REDUCER-I registry, a real-world observational study, included patients with RA and objective ischemia.
- AngioNOCAD was defined as <70% stenosis in major epicardial coronary arteries.
- Outcomes at 12 months included Canadian Cardiovascular Society class, Seattle Angina Questionnaires (SAQ), and major adverse events (MACE).
Main Results:
- 61 patients had AngioNOCAD, while 245 had obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Both groups showed significant improvements in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class and SAQ scores post-implantation.
- 12-month MACE rates were comparable between AngioNOCAD (7.0%) and obstructive CAD (8.0%) cohorts.
Conclusions:
- Coronary sinus (CS) Reducer implantation demonstrated significant symptom and quality of life improvements.
- CS Reducer may be an effective therapeutic option for patients with refractory angina and AngioNOCAD.
- The findings support the use of CS Reducer in patients with AngioNOCAD and no further revascularization options.
Background:
Patients with angiographically nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (AngioNOCAD), including those with previous successful revascularization, often experience refractory angina (RA).
Objectives:
The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of coronary sinus (CS) Reducer for the treatment of patients with AngioNOCAD and no further revascularization options.
Methods:
The REDUCER-I registry is a nonrandomized, real-world observational study of patients with RA, objective evidence of ischemia on noninvasive stress testing, and with no further revascularization options. AngioNOCAD was defined as < 70% stenosis by visual adjudication in all major epicardial coronary arteries at time of enrollment. 12-month outcomes included Canadian Cardiovascular Society class, Seattle Angina Questionnaires (SAQ), and major adverse events.
Results:
Of the 371 patients who received a CS Reducer implant, 306 reported baseline CAD type, 61/306 (19.9%) had AngioNOCAD, and 245/306 (80.1%) had obstructive CAD. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics although the AngioNOCAD patients were younger (65.8 ± 11.3 years vs 70.2 ± 8.7 years), had less prior coronary artery bypass grafting (44.3% vs 79.6%), and more prior percutaneous coronary intervention (44.3% vs 71.8%) than patients with obstructive CAD. Twelve months after CS Reducer implantation, 60.3% of the AngioNOCAD cohort and 71.7% of the obstructive CAD cohort had ≥1 Canadian Cardiovascular Society class improvement (P = 0.11). Twelve-month MACE rates were similar (AngioNOCAD 7.0%, obstructive CAD 8.0%), and both groups had significant improvements in SAQ angina frequency, quality of life, and mean SAQ summary score (P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
In the REDUCER-I registry, patients with RA and AngioNOCAD had significant improvements in their symptoms and quality of life suggesting that CS Reducer implantation may be an effective therapy in these patients.
More Related Videos
13:10Direct Re-implantation of Left Coronary Artery into the Aorta in Adults with Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery ALCAPA
Published on: April 24, 2017
06:32Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Angina II: Classification
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies