Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Outperforms Conventional Inflammatory Markers in Predicting Cardiovascular
Shijie Zhu1, Haiying Li2, Zipeng Ou3
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shenshan Medical Center, Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shanwei, People's Republic of China.
Background:
The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), a novel inflammatory index integrating neutrophil, platelet, and lymphocyte counts, predicts outcomes in several cardiovascular diseases, yet its role in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unclear. We therefore investigated the prognostic value of SII in HFpEF patients and compares its performance against other inflammatory markers, including systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 316 patients with HFpEF diagnosed between January 2017 and January 2021. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and HF rehospitalization were assessed over a median follow-up of 24 months. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were employed to evaluate the comparative prognostic performance of SII against SIRI, NLR and CRP.
Results:
Logistic regression models revealed that each 100-unit increase in SII was independently associated with elevated risks of cardiovascular mortality (OR:1.321, 95% CI:1.191-1.467, P<0.001) and HF rehospitalization (OR:1.168, 95% CI:1.098-1.241, P<0.001), but not with all-cause mortality (P>0.05). SII demonstrated superior prognostic performance compared to SIRI, NLR and CRP both in cardiovascular mortality (NRI range: 0.798-1.097; IDI range: 0.094-0.142, all P<0.05) and HF rehospitalization (NRI range: 0.254-0.455; IDI range: 0.016-0.066, all P<0.05). However, SII provided no incremental utility for all-cause mortality (P>0.05).
Conclusion:
SII emerges as a superior predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF compared to conventional inflammatory markers, supporting its use for risk stratification and as a potential therapeutic guide. Nevertheless, its association with all-cause mortality remains limited.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

