Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Information Load Predicts Stuttering Events
Haley J Warner1, Nan Bernstein Ratner2, Eric S Jackson1
1Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York.
Higher information load in words increases stuttering likelihood. This suggests communicative demands, not just severity, influence stuttering variability in spontaneous speech.
Area of Science:
- Speech and Language Pathology
- Computational Linguistics
Background:
- Stuttering variability is a complex phenomenon.
- Information load, measured by word predictability, is a potential factor influencing stuttering.
- Word surprisal quantifies information load based on linguistic context.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if words with higher information load (word surprisal) are more prone to stuttering.
- To control for linguistic variables affecting stuttering.
- To examine if stuttering severity and impact moderate the relationship between word surprisal and stuttering.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of spontaneous speech from 35 adults who stutter (FluencyBank corpus).
- Computation of word surprisal using Generative Pretrained Transformer 2 (GPT-2).
- Statistical control for six linguistic predictors of stuttering and moderation analysis with severity/impact measures.
Main Results:
- Increased word surprisal significantly predicted a higher likelihood of stuttering.
- Linguistic covariates were controlled for in the analysis.
- No significant moderation effect of stuttering severity or impact was found.
Conclusions:
- Higher information load in words contributes to stuttering events during spontaneous speech.
- This may be due to increased cognitive or communicative demands of high-surprisal words.
- Individual differences in managing communicative pressure, not solely clinical severity, likely shape stuttering patterns.
More Related Videos
12:43A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
Published on: February 21, 2011
08:36Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms
Published on: March 21, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Buffer Effectiveness
The buffer capacity is the amount of acid or base that can be added to a given volume...
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Steps in Outbreak Investigation