Fluency Should Not Be a Goal in Stuttering Therapy.

Area of Science:

• Speech-language pathology
• Communication sciences and disorders

Background:

• Fluency is often a desired outcome in stuttering therapy.
• Current therapies may not directly train fluency itself.
• The definition of fluency in stuttering is multifaceted, encompassing both speech quality and subjective experience.

Purpose of the Study:

• To argue against fluency as a primary goal in stuttering therapy.
• To distinguish between fluent-sounding speech and a fluent experience.
• To propose an alternative framework for therapy goals and outcome evaluation.

Main Methods:

• Distinguishing fluent-sounding speech from fluent experience.
• Examining the targets of fluency-focused therapy.
• Analyzing the limitations of using percent syllables stuttered (%SS) as a primary outcome measure.
• Outlining a process-goal framework emphasizing reduced struggle, avoidance, and increased spontaneity and participation.

Main Results:

• Therapies often train reduced overt stuttering or strategy-mediated speech, not fluency directly.
• Fluency is a context-dependent, multidimensional outcome, not a directly trainable state.
• Reductions in %SS alone may not capture crucial aspects like avoidance, reduced spontaneity, or participation costs.

Conclusions:

• Speech modification strategies are tools to reduce struggle and enhance communication, not direct paths to fluency.
• Fluency is best viewed as a potential byproduct of therapy.
• Treatment and evaluation should focus on directly targetable processes and real-world communication freedom.