Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multicompartment Models: Overview01:14

Multicompartment Models: Overview

697
Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
697
Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

655
Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
655
Classification of Systems-II01:31

Classification of Systems-II

555
Continuous-time systems have continuous input and output signals, with time measured continuously. These systems are generally defined by differential or algebraic equations. For instance, in an RC circuit, the relationship between input and output voltage is expressed through a differential equation derived from Ohm's law and the capacitor relation,
555
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

393
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
393
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

460
Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence of...
460

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An evolving view of phylogenetic biogeography.

Systematic biology·2026
Same author

Integrating Earth history into phylogenetic diversification models.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

The conquest and diversification of leafy spurges across the Holarctic and beyond: biogeography and evolution of life-history of Euphorbia subgenus Esula.

Annals of botany·2026
Same author

Diversification and spatio-temporal evolution of Cladoniaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycota), a widespread family of lichen-forming fungi.

Fungal biology·2026
Same author

Improving explanations for medical X-ray diagnosis combining variational autoencoders and adversarial machine learning.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

Phylogenomics and phylogeographic model testing using convolutional neural networks reveal a history of recent admixture in the Canarian Kleinia neriifolia.

Molecular ecology·2024

Related Experiment Videos

On the utility of Deep Learning for model classification and parameter estimation on complex diversification

Pablo Gutiérrez de la Peña1,2, Guillermo Iglesias3, Edgar Talavera3

  • 1Departamento de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Real Jardin Botanico-CSIC, Madrid, 28014, Spain.

Systematic Biology
|March 24, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Deep learning models, specifically Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), offer superior accuracy for inferring evolutionary diversification dynamics from phylogenetic trees compared to traditional Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE). CNNs achieved 80-93% accuracy in model classification, outperforming MLE.

Keywords:
Birth-death modelsconvolutional neural networksdeep learningdiversificationlikelihood-based methodsmacroevolution

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Computational phylogenetics
  • Machine learning in macroevolution

Background:

  • Birth-Death models are crucial for studying diversification dynamics using phylogenetic trees.
  • Traditional likelihood-based inference methods face computational challenges with complex models.
  • Deep Learning offers a computationally tractable approach to increase model complexity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for classification and regression tasks in phylogenetic diversification analysis.
  • To compare CNN performance against Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) for extant-only phylogenies under various diversification scenarios.
  • To apply trained CNN models for parameter estimation on empirical phylogenies.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated 10,000 phylogenetic trees for six diversification scenarios (e.g., Constant Birth-Death, Mass Extinction).
  • Encoded phylogenetic trees using the CDV vectorization procedure to capture branch length information.
  • Trained CNN models and compared their performance with Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE).

Main Results:

  • CNNs achieved 80-93% classification accuracy, significantly outperforming MLE (70-74%).
  • CNNs showed slightly lower mean average errors in regression tasks compared to MLE.
  • Both methods struggled with estimating ratio parameters like mass-extinction survival.

Conclusions:

  • CNNs provide a powerful and accurate tool for inferring diversification dynamics from phylogenetic data.
  • Further research should focus on incorporating rate-variable and lineage-heterogeneous models into deep learning frameworks.
  • Deep learning advances computational phylogenetics for macroevolutionary studies.